Immediate versus staged complete revascularization using drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis after the OPTION-STEMI trial

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization is recommended for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. However, the optimal timing of non-culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial, ranging from treatment during the initial procedure to several weeks after the acute event. AIMS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE through September 2025 for randomized controlled trials comparing immediate vs. staged complete revascularization with drug-eluting stents in patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing primary PCI. METHODS: The primary endpoint was death from cardiac causes at a median follow-up of 12 months. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), any unplanned revascularization, target-vessel revascularization, target-lesion revascularization, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, and stroke. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials including 2837 patients (1441 immediate and 1446 staged) were analyzed. At 12 months, death from cardiac cause occurred at comparable rates between strategies (risk ratio [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.01; P = 0.33). No significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00; P = 0.13), non-fatal MI (RR. 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.04; P = 0.17), target vessel revascularization (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; P = 0.48), or target lesion revascularization (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02; P = 0.34). Similarly, no differences were found for stroke (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01; P = 0.75), major bleeding (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P = 0.21), or AKI (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P = 0.79). Immediate complete revascularization may be associated with a trend towards lower rates of unplanned revascularization compared with staged PCI (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary disease, an immediate complete revascularization strategy showed comparable rates of death from cardiac cause and non-fatal MI as compared with staged complete revascularization at a median of 12 months of follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kardiologia Polska
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33963/v.phj.111932
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immediate versus staged complete revascularization using drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis after the OPTION-STEMI trial

Riccardo Improta, Paola Scarparo, Riccardo Colantonio, Ovidio De Filippo et al.
Kardiologia Polska
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Immediate versus staged complete revascularization using drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis after the OPTION-STEMI trial

Riccardo Improta, Paola Scarparo, Riccardo Colantonio, Ovidio De Filippo, Gianluca Di Pietro, R Diletti, Gennaro Sardella, Fabrizio Tomai, Massimo Mancone, Fabrizio D’Ascenzo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization is recommended for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. However, the optimal timing of non-culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial, ranging from treatment during the initial procedure to several weeks after the acute event. AIMS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE through September 2025 for randomized controlled trials comparing immediate vs. staged complete revascularization with drug-eluting stents in patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing primary PCI. METHODS: The primary endpoint was death from cardiac causes at a median follow-up of 12 months. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), any unplanned revascularization, target-vessel revascularization, target-lesion revascularization, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, and stroke. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials including 2837 patients (1441 immediate and 1446 staged) were analyzed. At 12 months, death from cardiac cause occurred at comparable rates between strategies (risk ratio [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.01; P = 0.33). No significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00; P = 0.13), non-fatal MI (RR. 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.04; P = 0.17), target vessel revascularization (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; P = 0.48), or target lesion revascularization (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02; P = 0.34). Similarly, no differences were found for stroke (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01; P = 0.75), major bleeding (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P = 0.21), or AKI (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P = 0.79). Immediate complete revascularization may be associated with a trend towards lower rates of unplanned revascularization compared with staged PCI (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary disease, an immediate complete revascularization strategy showed comparable rates of death from cardiac cause and non-fatal MI as compared with staged complete revascularization at a median of 12 months of follow-up.

Kardiologia PolskaVol. 84(4)
Erasmus MC (NL), Aurelia Hospital (IT), University of Turin (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.