Boundary and Interface Systems: Admissibility at the Point of Contact

This paper establishes boundary and interface systems as the domain-level realisation of admissibility within the Paton System. While prior work defines admissibility as the condition for system membership, observation as registration, and continuation as persistence, the location at which these conditions are enforced has not been formally isolated. This paper shows that boundaries function as active constraint interfaces where admissibility is evaluated, rather than passive separations. Interfaces define the structured pathways through which systems interact, while boundaries determine whether such interactions are permitted. Interaction is therefore contingent on admissibility at the boundary. This provides a unified structural interpretation of interaction across physical, biological, computational, and cognitive domains, positioning boundary systems as the operational expression of admissibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19364085
Primary Topic
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boundary and Interface Systems: Admissibility at the Point of Contact

Andrew John Paton
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
article

Boundary and Interface Systems: Admissibility at the Point of Contact

Andrew John Paton
article en

Abstract

This paper establishes boundary and interface systems as the domain-level realisation of admissibility within the Paton System. While prior work defines admissibility as the condition for system membership, observation as registration, and continuation as persistence, the location at which these conditions are enforced has not been formally isolated. This paper shows that boundaries function as active constraint interfaces where admissibility is evaluated, rather than passive separations. Interfaces define the structured pathways through which systems interact, while boundaries determine whether such interactions are permitted. Interaction is therefore contingent on admissibility at the boundary. This provides a unified structural interpretation of interaction across physical, biological, computational, and cognitive domains, positioning boundary systems as the operational expression of admissibility.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.