Charting Uncharted Waters: Unravelling Extraterritorial Duties under Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR

Abstract The article will examine the extent and scope of States’ positive obligations under Article 2 (right to life) and Article 3 (prohibition of torture) of the European Convention of Human Rights ( ECHR ) in the context of shipwrecks involving migrants, including those occurring in extraterritorial waters. While the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has increasingly recognized States’ duties to prevent loss of life and to protect individuals from inhuman and degrading treatment, the precise contours of these obligations remain contested in cases of maritime distress. We argue that States have a duty not only to undertake proactive measures to prevent such tragedies, but also to ensure rigorous post-incident accountability. This includes an obligation to investigate shipwrecks thoroughly and to institute appropriate inquiries, including criminal proceedings when necessary. The analysis will take into account the relevant ECtHR case law. We will demonstrate that the extraterritorial nature of these incidents does not have to absolve States of their responsibilities under the ECHR . In doing so, we highlight the need for a coherent legal framework to address the accountability gap and strengthen the protection of migrants at sea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Migration and Law
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340218
Primary Topic
Maritime Security and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Charting Uncharted Waters: Unravelling Extraterritorial Duties under Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR

Matteo Zamboni, Cara E. Shields, Martha Mills, Marta Minetti et al.
European Journal of Migration and Law
Maritime Security and History
article

Charting Uncharted Waters: Unravelling Extraterritorial Duties under Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR

Matteo Zamboni, Cara E. Shields, Martha Mills, Marta Minetti, Aneesa Rajah
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article will examine the extent and scope of States’ positive obligations under Article 2 (right to life) and Article 3 (prohibition of torture) of the European Convention of Human Rights ( ECHR ) in the context of shipwrecks involving migrants, including those occurring in extraterritorial waters. While the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has increasingly recognized States’ duties to prevent loss of life and to protect individuals from inhuman and degrading treatment, the precise contours of these obligations remain contested in cases of maritime distress. We argue that States have a duty not only to undertake proactive measures to prevent such tragedies, but also to ensure rigorous post-incident accountability. This includes an obligation to investigate shipwrecks thoroughly and to institute appropriate inquiries, including criminal proceedings when necessary. The analysis will take into account the relevant ECtHR case law. We will demonstrate that the extraterritorial nature of these incidents does not have to absolve States of their responsibilities under the ECHR . In doing so, we highlight the need for a coherent legal framework to address the accountability gap and strengthen the protection of migrants at sea.

European Journal of Migration and LawVol. 28(1)
Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Maritime Security and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.