Nucleoprotein and glycoprotein based serological assays for detection of Marburg virus infections

BACKGROUND: Marburg virus disease (MVD) is a rare but highly fatal zoonotic illness. Current serological tools are limited by their reliance on glycoprotein (GP)-based antigens or Marburg virus infected cell lysates, which cannot distinguish natural infection induced immune responses from GP-based vaccines. This diagnostic gap complicates the detection of missed cases particularly in areas of high vaccination coverage. METHODS: We developed and validated two complementary assays: a nucleoprotein C-terminal tail (NPct) Mix-and-Read (MR) assay and a recombinant GP1,2ΔTM ELISA. Serum samples used for validation were collected 6-9 months after the 2024 Rwanda MVD outbreak from RT-PCR-confirmed recovered patients (n = 36) and uninfected contacts (n = 46). Assay validation included additional serum controls from pre-outbreak Rwandan samples, Ebola virus disease recovered patients, and Rousettus aegyptiacus bats experimentally infected with MARV. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to assess clinical accuracy. FINDINGS: The MARV anti-NPct MR assay demonstrated near-perfect discrimination between cases and controls with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.996 (95% CI, 0.990-1.000), and yielding performance of 94.4% clinical sensitivity (95% CI, 81.9-99.0%) and 99.7% specificity (95% CI, 98.1-100.0%), and no cross-reactivity with Ebola convalescent sera. The MARV GP ELISA achieved 94.4% clinical sensitivity (95% CI, 81.9-99.0%) and 100% specificity (95% CI, 92.3-100%) with an AUC 0.973 (95% CI, 0.922-1.000). Both assays produced concordant results for all samples tested. In experimentally infected bats, the MARV anti-NPct MR assay achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. INTERPRETATION: The MARV anti-NPct MR assay provides a rapid, high-throughput, species-agnostic tool expected to differentiate natural infection from vaccine-induced immunity, addressing a critical gap in the current MVD diagnostic pipeline. Its robust validation in the largest cohort of recovered patients to date and applicability to reservoir hosts highlight its broad utility for outbreak response, follow-up care, and ecological studies. FUNDING: This work was supported by funding from US Centers for Disease Control and prevention, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), and Rwanda Biomedical Centre.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EBioMedicine
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106244
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nucleoprotein and glycoprotein based serological assays for detection of Marburg virus infections

Agnes Gasengayire, Elif Karaaslan, William E. Dowling, César G. Albariño et al.
EBioMedicine
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
article

Nucleoprotein and glycoprotein based serological assays for detection of Marburg virus infections

Agnes Gasengayire, Elif Karaaslan, William E. Dowling, César G. Albariño, Jean Marie Uwimana, Amy J. Schuh, Emmanuel Kabalisa, Misbah Gashegu, Polina Brangel, Claude Mambo Muvunyi, Markus H. Kainulainen, Albert Tuyishime, Thierry H. Roels, Jonathan S. Towner, Tsion Firew, Jessica R. Harmon, Nouh Saad Mohamed, Jean Claude Semuto Ngabonziza, Mary Joung Choi, Jean Luc Benimana, Bruce Rwagitinywa, James Kagame, Herve Murenzi, Eric Bergeron, Joel M. Montgomery, Isabelle Mukagatare, Shilpi Jain, Tara Sealy, Jennifer Akimana, Richard C.N. Mwesigwa, Ayman Ahmed, Christina F. Spiropoulou, Enock Karekezi, Ange Umwari, Claudine Kabageni
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Marburg virus disease (MVD) is a rare but highly fatal zoonotic illness. Current serological tools are limited by their reliance on glycoprotein (GP)-based antigens or Marburg virus infected cell lysates, which cannot distinguish natural infection induced immune responses from GP-based vaccines. This diagnostic gap complicates the detection of missed cases particularly in areas of high vaccination coverage. METHODS: We developed and validated two complementary assays: a nucleoprotein C-terminal tail (NPct) Mix-and-Read (MR) assay and a recombinant GP1,2ΔTM ELISA. Serum samples used for validation were collected 6-9 months after the 2024 Rwanda MVD outbreak from RT-PCR-confirmed recovered patients (n = 36) and uninfected contacts (n = 46). Assay validation included additional serum controls from pre-outbreak Rwandan samples, Ebola virus disease recovered patients, and Rousettus aegyptiacus bats experimentally infected with MARV. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to assess clinical accuracy. FINDINGS: The MARV anti-NPct MR assay demonstrated near-perfect discrimination between cases and controls with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.996 (95% CI, 0.990-1.000), and yielding performance of 94.4% clinical sensitivity (95% CI, 81.9-99.0%) and 99.7% specificity (95% CI, 98.1-100.0%), and no cross-reactivity with Ebola convalescent sera. The MARV GP ELISA achieved 94.4% clinical sensitivity (95% CI, 81.9-99.0%) and 100% specificity (95% CI, 92.3-100%) with an AUC 0.973 (95% CI, 0.922-1.000). Both assays produced concordant results for all samples tested. In experimentally infected bats, the MARV anti-NPct MR assay achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. INTERPRETATION: The MARV anti-NPct MR assay provides a rapid, high-throughput, species-agnostic tool expected to differentiate natural infection from vaccine-induced immunity, addressing a critical gap in the current MVD diagnostic pipeline. Its robust validation in the largest cohort of recovered patients to date and applicability to reservoir hosts highlight its broad utility for outbreak response, follow-up care, and ecological studies. FUNDING: This work was supported by funding from US Centers for Disease Control and prevention, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), and Rwanda Biomedical Centre.

EBioMedicineVol. 127
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), University of Georgia (US), University of Kigali (RW), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (NO), Rwanda Biomedical Center (RW)
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation, Rwanda Biomedical Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.