High-intensity interval training versus plyometric training on performance measures among recreational runners: a randomized controlled trial

High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Plyometric training are both well-established methods for improving athletic performance. Despite their popularity, limited experimental evidence directly compares their effects in recreational runners. This study aimed to compare the impact of HIIT and Plyometric training on agility, lower limb power, sprint speed, and functional performance. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 recreational runners allocated to HIIT (Group A), Plyometric training (Group B), or Control (Group C). Participants underwent supervised exercise sessions three times per week for six weeks. Performance outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 3, and week 6, including agility (T test), lower limb power (vertical jump test), sprint speed (50 m sprint), and functional performance (Figure-8 Hop Test). Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups for age (mean 22.75–23.90 years), BMI (mean 25.34–26.37 kg/m²), and other demographics. Post-intervention analyses demonstrated significant improvements in Groups A and B compared to the Control group (p < 0.001) across all measured outcomes. Group A (HIIT) showed improvements in agility (12.60 ± 1.67 s), lower limb power (29.75 ± 8.97), sprint speed (3.90 ± 0.70 s), and functional performance (5.91 ± 0.44 s). Group B (Plyometric training) also showed significant improvements versus Control, but no statistically significant differences were observed between Groups A and B (p > 0.05). This study shows that both HIIT and plyometric training effectively improve performance in recreational runners, with no statistically significant differences between the two methods. The findings support equivalence in effectiveness across all measured outcomes. HIIT may be preferred for its time efficiency, but both approaches are valid training options. The trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) under the registration number CTRI/2024/04/065310, dated 5th April 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01672-2
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-intensity interval training versus plyometric training on performance measures among recreational runners: a randomized controlled trial

Puneeta Ajmera, Abdul Rahim Shaikh, Msaad Alzhrani, Ahmad Alanazi et al.
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Sports Performance and Training
article

High-intensity interval training versus plyometric training on performance measures among recreational runners: a randomized controlled trial

Puneeta Ajmera, Abdul Rahim Shaikh, Msaad Alzhrani, Ahmad Alanazi, Mohammad Miraj, Sheetal Kalra, Toufiq Noor, Archana Khanna, D. Bidhuri, Shalini Mishra, Mohit Batra
article en

Abstract

High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Plyometric training are both well-established methods for improving athletic performance. Despite their popularity, limited experimental evidence directly compares their effects in recreational runners. This study aimed to compare the impact of HIIT and Plyometric training on agility, lower limb power, sprint speed, and functional performance. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 recreational runners allocated to HIIT (Group A), Plyometric training (Group B), or Control (Group C). Participants underwent supervised exercise sessions three times per week for six weeks. Performance outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 3, and week 6, including agility (T test), lower limb power (vertical jump test), sprint speed (50 m sprint), and functional performance (Figure-8 Hop Test). Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups for age (mean 22.75–23.90 years), BMI (mean 25.34–26.37 kg/m²), and other demographics. Post-intervention analyses demonstrated significant improvements in Groups A and B compared to the Control group (p < 0.001) across all measured outcomes. Group A (HIIT) showed improvements in agility (12.60 ± 1.67 s), lower limb power (29.75 ± 8.97), sprint speed (3.90 ± 0.70 s), and functional performance (5.91 ± 0.44 s). Group B (Plyometric training) also showed significant improvements versus Control, but no statistically significant differences were observed between Groups A and B (p > 0.05). This study shows that both HIIT and plyometric training effectively improve performance in recreational runners, with no statistically significant differences between the two methods. The findings support equivalence in effectiveness across all measured outcomes. HIIT may be preferred for its time efficiency, but both approaches are valid training options. The trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) under the registration number CTRI/2024/04/065310, dated 5th April 2024.

BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Majmaah University (SA), Delhi Pharmaceutical Science and Research University (IN), Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN), Agilent Technologies (India) (IN), Sharda University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.