Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Dynamics: Do Ownership and Capital Structures Matter in Listed Chinese Firms?

ABSTRACT This study examines how economic policy uncertainty (EPU) affects corporate investment in China using a two‐step system generalized method of moments estimation from 4502 listed firms (2007–2023). Results reveal a non‐linear, inverted U‐shaped relationship: moderate EPU stimulates total and short‐term investments, while excessive EPU suppresses them. EPU amplifies the contractionary effects on long‐term and intangible asset investments under high uncertainty. Ownership and capital structures exert key moderating roles: Concentrated ownership enhances investment stability, whereas institutional and state ownership amplify contractions. Debt financing weakens investment responsiveness through leverage amplification, whereas equity financing provides a capital buffer that sustains investment under moderate EPU. The 2008 Global Financial Crisis intensified the adverse effects of high EPU on investment, whereas COVID‐19 stimulus policies mitigated the contractionary effects. Large firms exhibit lower sensitivity to EPU, while small firms display an inverted U‐shaped response, reflecting stronger financing constraints. These findings provide novel insights for corporate decision‐making and policy design in uncertain environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Economic Review
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.70019
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Dynamics: Do Ownership and Capital Structures Matter in Listed Chinese Firms?

Mingqing Yuan
Pacific Economic Review
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Dynamics: Do Ownership and Capital Structures Matter in Listed Chinese Firms?

Mingqing Yuan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how economic policy uncertainty (EPU) affects corporate investment in China using a two‐step system generalized method of moments estimation from 4502 listed firms (2007–2023). Results reveal a non‐linear, inverted U‐shaped relationship: moderate EPU stimulates total and short‐term investments, while excessive EPU suppresses them. EPU amplifies the contractionary effects on long‐term and intangible asset investments under high uncertainty. Ownership and capital structures exert key moderating roles: Concentrated ownership enhances investment stability, whereas institutional and state ownership amplify contractions. Debt financing weakens investment responsiveness through leverage amplification, whereas equity financing provides a capital buffer that sustains investment under moderate EPU. The 2008 Global Financial Crisis intensified the adverse effects of high EPU on investment, whereas COVID‐19 stimulus policies mitigated the contractionary effects. Large firms exhibit lower sensitivity to EPU, while small firms display an inverted U‐shaped response, reflecting stronger financing constraints. These findings provide novel insights for corporate decision‐making and policy design in uncertain environments.

Pacific Economic ReviewVol. 31(2)
Osaka University of Economics (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Dynamics: Do Ownership and Capital Structures Matter in Listed Chinese Firms? — Mingqing Yuan · Pacific Economic Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS