Public perceptions of polygenic testing and embryo selection for non-medical traits
Some advances in reproductive technologies raise substantial ethical and psychological challenges, for example, the use of preimplantation genetic testing to select embryos based on non-medical traits. While studies have explored public willingness to use preimplantation genetic testing for medical or non-medical attributes, stated willingness may not reflect implantation decisions when such information is available. This large cross-national study examined public views on polygenic embryo testing. In a US sample (N = 1,467), participants were more willing to test for medical conditions (for example, heart disease) than non-medical traits (for example, antisocial behaviour or low intelligence), although over half supported testing for non-medical traits. In a forced-choice implantation task, participants used medical and non-medical information to a similar extent when making decisions. Similar patterns were observed in Chinese participants (N = 623). These findings suggest variability in choices across specific traits and conditions, rather than a uniform distinction between medical conditions and non-medical traits. The Stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 7 October 2025. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://osf.io/vb9c2 .
Authors
- Brian David Earp (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9691-2888)
- Peng Liu
- Joanna Demaree-Cotton
- Julian Savulescu
- Dominic Wilkinson
- Owen Schaefer
- Jim AC Everett
- Edmond Awad
- Ilina Singh
- Clara Colombatto
Institutions
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- University of Kent (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2026-08-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02562-w
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research Institute
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Leverhulme Trust
- Department of Health and Social Care
- National University of Singapore
- Ministry of Education - Singapore
- Zhejiang University