Using core components in process evaluation: Passport skills for life

Although school-based SEL programmes show robust effects in controlled studies, their real-world impact varies due to inconsistent implementation. Core components (CCs), the essential theory or evidence-based elements required to reliably produce intended effects, offer a framework to address this gap. A CC-informed approach can shift evaluation from whether a programme was delivered to how its active ingredients functioned in context and how well. We conducted a two-phase qualitative process evaluation of Passport: Skills for Life, integrating top-down and bottom-up evidence. Phase 1 involved systematic analysis of manuals, lesson plans, and resources to distil practice and instructional CCs. Phase 2 examined enactment via non-participant observations (n = 12) and semi-structured teacher interviews (n = 9) across four primary schools in North-West England. Data were analysed using deductive content and thematic analyses. We identified five practice and seven instructional CCs. Core practices-coping, self-awareness, and social awareness-were typically delivered, whereas more complex interpersonal skills (help-seeking/giving, relationship skills) were seldom observed. Instructionally, low-intensity formats (didactic talk, whole-class discussion, short written tasks) predominated, while high-engagement activities (role-plays, situation cards, Dragon's Path) were often truncated or omitted. Delivery quality varied: facilitation sometimes built conceptual understanding, competence-building promoted rehearsal and modelling, yet disengaged practices weakened socio-emotional norms. Teacher warmth, responsiveness, and emotional literacy were pivotal; when present, SEL activities reinforced prosocial behaviours, but when absent, delivery narrowed to surface-level coverage. By linking programme theory with classroom enactment, this study shows how a CC-informed lens can reveal fidelity and quality of delivery patterns, offering a theory-aligned framework for scaling and sustaining school-based SEL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346416
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using core components in process evaluation: Passport skills for life

Suzanne Hamilton, Michael Wigelsworth, Annie O’Brien, Neil Humphrey et al.
PLoS ONE
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Using core components in process evaluation: Passport skills for life

Suzanne Hamilton, Michael Wigelsworth, Annie O’Brien, Neil Humphrey, Melek Alemdar, Pamela Qualter
article en

Abstract

Although school-based SEL programmes show robust effects in controlled studies, their real-world impact varies due to inconsistent implementation. Core components (CCs), the essential theory or evidence-based elements required to reliably produce intended effects, offer a framework to address this gap. A CC-informed approach can shift evaluation from whether a programme was delivered to how its active ingredients functioned in context and how well. We conducted a two-phase qualitative process evaluation of Passport: Skills for Life, integrating top-down and bottom-up evidence. Phase 1 involved systematic analysis of manuals, lesson plans, and resources to distil practice and instructional CCs. Phase 2 examined enactment via non-participant observations (n = 12) and semi-structured teacher interviews (n = 9) across four primary schools in North-West England. Data were analysed using deductive content and thematic analyses. We identified five practice and seven instructional CCs. Core practices-coping, self-awareness, and social awareness-were typically delivered, whereas more complex interpersonal skills (help-seeking/giving, relationship skills) were seldom observed. Instructionally, low-intensity formats (didactic talk, whole-class discussion, short written tasks) predominated, while high-engagement activities (role-plays, situation cards, Dragon's Path) were often truncated or omitted. Delivery quality varied: facilitation sometimes built conceptual understanding, competence-building promoted rehearsal and modelling, yet disengaged practices weakened socio-emotional norms. Teacher warmth, responsiveness, and emotional literacy were pivotal; when present, SEL activities reinforced prosocial behaviours, but when absent, delivery narrowed to surface-level coverage. By linking programme theory with classroom enactment, this study shows how a CC-informed lens can reveal fidelity and quality of delivery patterns, offering a theory-aligned framework for scaling and sustaining school-based SEL.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(3)
University of Manchester (GB), Space Research Institute (UA), Necmettin Erbakan University (TR)
Kavlifondet, Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.