The Empiricism-Skepticism Marriage: An Analysis of Epistemic Gatekeeping in Modern Science

This paper examines the structural relationship between empiricism and skepticism as gatekeeping mechanisms in modern scientific epistemology. We argue that when combined as absolute principles, these two foundational pillars create a self-defeating system that blocks the emergence of new knowledge while maintaining the appearance of rigor. Through analysis of the "chain of stupidity" and application to five major scientific theories, we demonstrate that this marriage of principles functions not as a truth-seeking mechanism but as a status quo protection system. The paper concludes that modern science survives not by adhering to these principles but by selectively violating them—a pragmatic hypocrisy that enables progress while maintaining rhetorical commitment to impossible standards.If you want a new scientific standard and to seek the truth, check out: Geometric Necessity Framework (GNF) of Tình Lâm GEOMETRIC NECESSITY FRAMEWORK (GNF): A Unified Foundation for All Science

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19362947
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Empiricism-Skepticism Marriage: An Analysis of Epistemic Gatekeeping in Modern Science

Tình Lâm
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and History of Science
article

The Empiricism-Skepticism Marriage: An Analysis of Epistemic Gatekeeping in Modern Science

Tình Lâm
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the structural relationship between empiricism and skepticism as gatekeeping mechanisms in modern scientific epistemology. We argue that when combined as absolute principles, these two foundational pillars create a self-defeating system that blocks the emergence of new knowledge while maintaining the appearance of rigor. Through analysis of the "chain of stupidity" and application to five major scientific theories, we demonstrate that this marriage of principles functions not as a truth-seeking mechanism but as a status quo protection system. The paper concludes that modern science survives not by adhering to these principles but by selectively violating them—a pragmatic hypocrisy that enables progress while maintaining rhetorical commitment to impossible standards.If you want a new scientific standard and to seek the truth, check out: Geometric Necessity Framework (GNF) of Tình Lâm GEOMETRIC NECESSITY FRAMEWORK (GNF): A Unified Foundation for All Science

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.