Towards an Era of Oculomics: The Relationship Between Baseline Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy and Risk of Mortality

PURPOSE: To assess whether baseline diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity is associated with mortality after accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 524,687 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) receiving care at health systems in the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) consortium, 2010-2023. METHODS: Clinical data from electronic health records of patients with DM were linked to mortality data from the National Death Index. Patients were categorized at their initial eyecare visit into six groups based on the level of DR in the more affected eye: DM without DR; non-proliferative DR (NPDR) without diabetic macular edema (DME); NPDR with DME; proliferative DR (PDR) without DME; PDR with DME; and unspecified DR severity. Cox regression modeling assessed the hazard of mortality associated with baseline DR severity, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, such as glycosylated hemoglobin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard of mortality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The mean age was 59.1±16 years; 283,465 patients (54.0%) were female, 95,160 (18.1%) were Black, 66,547 (12.7%) were Latinx, and 306,104 (58.3%) were White. A total of 36,674 patients (7.0%) died over a mean 5.4±4.1 years of follow-up. After adjustment for potential confounders, compared to patients with DM without DR, those with NPDR without DME (HR:1.34; 95%CI:1.29-1.39) had a 34% increased hazard of death, those with NPDR with DME (HR:1.31; 95%CI:1.20-1.43) had a 31% increased hazard of death, those with PDR without DME (HR:2.28; 95%CI:2.17-2.39) had a 128% increased hazard of death, and those with PDR and DME (HR:1.87; 95%CI:1.72-2.05) had an 87% increased hazard of death. Older age, male sex, and residence in a less affluent community were also associated with increased hazard of death (p<0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NPDR and PDR with or without DME are at higher risk of death over an average of 5 years of follow-up relative to diabetics without DR. These associations remain after adjusting for potential confounders. Eyecare professionals should be incentivized to communicate DR severity status to other medical professionals, as this may serve as an important opportunity to identify and address patients' medical comorbidities that may increase their mortality risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.03.023
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an Era of Oculomics: The Relationship Between Baseline Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy and Risk of Mortality

Jeremy A. Lavine, Adovich S. Rivera, Paul J. Bryar, Dustin D. French et al.
Ophthalmology
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Towards an Era of Oculomics: The Relationship Between Baseline Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy and Risk of Mortality

Jeremy A. Lavine, Adovich S. Rivera, Paul J. Bryar, Dustin D. French, Stephanie S. Lee, Shikha Marwah, Chris A. Andrews, Sandeepkumar Gaddam
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether baseline diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity is associated with mortality after accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 524,687 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) receiving care at health systems in the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) consortium, 2010-2023. METHODS: Clinical data from electronic health records of patients with DM were linked to mortality data from the National Death Index. Patients were categorized at their initial eyecare visit into six groups based on the level of DR in the more affected eye: DM without DR; non-proliferative DR (NPDR) without diabetic macular edema (DME); NPDR with DME; proliferative DR (PDR) without DME; PDR with DME; and unspecified DR severity. Cox regression modeling assessed the hazard of mortality associated with baseline DR severity, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, such as glycosylated hemoglobin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard of mortality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The mean age was 59.1±16 years; 283,465 patients (54.0%) were female, 95,160 (18.1%) were Black, 66,547 (12.7%) were Latinx, and 306,104 (58.3%) were White. A total of 36,674 patients (7.0%) died over a mean 5.4±4.1 years of follow-up. After adjustment for potential confounders, compared to patients with DM without DR, those with NPDR without DME (HR:1.34; 95%CI:1.29-1.39) had a 34% increased hazard of death, those with NPDR with DME (HR:1.31; 95%CI:1.20-1.43) had a 31% increased hazard of death, those with PDR without DME (HR:2.28; 95%CI:2.17-2.39) had a 128% increased hazard of death, and those with PDR and DME (HR:1.87; 95%CI:1.72-2.05) had an 87% increased hazard of death. Older age, male sex, and residence in a less affluent community were also associated with increased hazard of death (p<0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NPDR and PDR with or without DME are at higher risk of death over an average of 5 years of follow-up relative to diabetics without DR. These associations remain after adjusting for potential confounders. Eyecare professionals should be incentivized to communicate DR severity status to other medical professionals, as this may serve as an important opportunity to identify and address patients' medical comorbidities that may increase their mortality risk.

Ophthalmology
Northwestern University (US), University of Michigan (US)
Research to Prevent Blindness, National Eye Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.