Nonmetric Traits at the Enamel‐Dentine Junction and Crown Tissue Proportions of Canines and Premolars in Neandertals and Modern Humans: Impact of Sample Composition on Taxonomic Discrimination

OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the efficacy of analyzing nonmetric traits at the enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) and tissue proportions of upper and lower canines and premolars to distinguish Neandertals from modern humans. It also evaluates the impact of sample composition and size for taxonomical analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ) were measured. RESULTS: , although there is substantial overlap with modern humans. DISCUSSION: Analyzing nonmetric trait combinations represents a viable method for distinguishing Neandertal from modern humans, with a particular emphasis on fourth premolars. While Neandertals generally exhibit thinner enamel than modern humans, caution is needed when using enamel thickness as a diagnostic criterion due to the considerable overlap between the groups. Additionally, the composition and size of the Neandertal and modern human samples significantly influence the enamel thickness results. These results further prompt a reassessment of evolutionary changes in enamel thickness among Middle Pleistocene European populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.70239
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonmetric Traits at the Enamel‐Dentine Junction and Crown Tissue Proportions of Canines and Premolars in Neandertals and Modern Humans: Impact of Sample Composition on Taxonomic Discrimination

Thomas Colard, Gaël Becam, Tony Chevalier
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Nonmetric Traits at the Enamel‐Dentine Junction and Crown Tissue Proportions of Canines and Premolars in Neandertals and Modern Humans: Impact of Sample Composition on Taxonomic Discrimination

Thomas Colard, Gaël Becam, Tony Chevalier
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the efficacy of analyzing nonmetric traits at the enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) and tissue proportions of upper and lower canines and premolars to distinguish Neandertals from modern humans. It also evaluates the impact of sample composition and size for taxonomical analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ) were measured. RESULTS: , although there is substantial overlap with modern humans. DISCUSSION: Analyzing nonmetric trait combinations represents a viable method for distinguishing Neandertal from modern humans, with a particular emphasis on fourth premolars. While Neandertals generally exhibit thinner enamel than modern humans, caution is needed when using enamel thickness as a diagnostic criterion due to the considerable overlap between the groups. Additionally, the composition and size of the Neandertal and modern human samples significantly influence the enamel thickness results. These results further prompt a reassessment of evolutionary changes in enamel thickness among Middle Pleistocene European populations.

American Journal of Biological AnthropologyVol. 189(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Université de Lille (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Structure et Instabilité des Génomes (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.