Psychosocial outcomes of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in high-risk populations: A systematic review update

Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening programmes for lung cancer are being implemented worldwide, and the psychological impacts of LDCT screening need to be understood. We have updated, and expanded, a systematic review of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes associated with LDCT for lung cancer in high-risk individuals which was published in 2018. The original systematic review sought HRQoL from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only. In this update review, we have expanded the inclusion criteria so that HRQoL data from any study design are relevant. We searched electronic databases from January 2017. Titles and abstracts, and subsequent full-texts, were screened by one person against pre-defined criteria. Data extraction was conducted by one person and checked by a second. After screening 29,097 articles, we did not identify any new HRQoL evidence from RCTs. Thirteen non-RCTs met our inclusion criteria. No statistically significant impacts of LDCT screening were observed in the nine studies measuring general QoL; two out of nine studies reported increases in measures of anxiety (and depression in one study); two out of eleven studies observed short-term negative impacts on psychological cancer-specific outcomes; a further two studies reported statistically significant negative impacts for sub-groups of participants. Our findings suggests that LDCT screening does not markedly impact the psychosocial outcomes of individuals being screened. However, the included studies measured the outcomes at different timepoints and had diverging participant inclusion criteria. Large differences in sample size and loss to follow-up may also affect the validity of the results from the included studies. Although there is limited evidence to indicate that LDCT screening impacts significantly on psychosocial outcomes, it is necessary to ensure that all stages of screening delivery and communication promote wellbeing, motivate positive behaviour change and maximise patient benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2026.103063
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosocial outcomes of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in high-risk populations: A systematic review update

Chris Hyde, Jaime L. Peters, Andrew Jubane, Sophie Robinson
Cancer Epidemiology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Psychosocial outcomes of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in high-risk populations: A systematic review update

Chris Hyde, Jaime L. Peters, Andrew Jubane, Sophie Robinson
article en

Abstract

Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening programmes for lung cancer are being implemented worldwide, and the psychological impacts of LDCT screening need to be understood. We have updated, and expanded, a systematic review of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes associated with LDCT for lung cancer in high-risk individuals which was published in 2018. The original systematic review sought HRQoL from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only. In this update review, we have expanded the inclusion criteria so that HRQoL data from any study design are relevant. We searched electronic databases from January 2017. Titles and abstracts, and subsequent full-texts, were screened by one person against pre-defined criteria. Data extraction was conducted by one person and checked by a second. After screening 29,097 articles, we did not identify any new HRQoL evidence from RCTs. Thirteen non-RCTs met our inclusion criteria. No statistically significant impacts of LDCT screening were observed in the nine studies measuring general QoL; two out of nine studies reported increases in measures of anxiety (and depression in one study); two out of eleven studies observed short-term negative impacts on psychological cancer-specific outcomes; a further two studies reported statistically significant negative impacts for sub-groups of participants. Our findings suggests that LDCT screening does not markedly impact the psychosocial outcomes of individuals being screened. However, the included studies measured the outcomes at different timepoints and had diverging participant inclusion criteria. Large differences in sample size and loss to follow-up may also affect the validity of the results from the included studies. Although there is limited evidence to indicate that LDCT screening impacts significantly on psychosocial outcomes, it is necessary to ensure that all stages of screening delivery and communication promote wellbeing, motivate positive behaviour change and maximise patient benefit.

Cancer EpidemiologyVol. 102
University of Exeter (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Psychosocial outcomes of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in high-risk populations: A systematic review update — Chris Hyde, Jaime L. Peters, et al. · Cancer Epidemiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS