Perceived socioeconomic vulnerability, but not objective poverty, is linked to interoception through perceived stress

Introduction: Socioeconomic vulnerability is associated with higher levels of stress and adverse effects on physical, mental, and cognitive health. However, its influence on interoceptive awareness-defined as the perception, interpretation, and regulation of bodily signals-remains underexplored. This study examined the relationships between objective (multidimensional poverty) and subjective (perceived vulnerability) measures of socioeconomic vulnerability, perceived stress, and interoceptive awareness, as well as the mediating role of stress. Methods: A total of 104 adults (50 women, 54 men; aged 30-45 years; mean schooling = 14.7 years) completed self-report measures of perceived vulnerability, perceived stress, and interoceptive awareness using the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). Results: Perceived vulnerability, but not multidimensional poverty, was negatively associated with interoceptive awareness, both at the total MAIA score level and across subscales. Furthermore, perceived stress partially mediated the association between perceived vulnerability and interoceptive awareness. Discussion: These findings suggest that the subjective perception of socioeconomic vulnerability may impair the ability to attend to and consciously use bodily signals through psycho-affective and cognitive mechanisms. This complements physiological models linking socioeconomic experiences with interoceptive processes, highlighting the relevance of subjective vulnerability in shaping interoceptive functioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1713385
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived socioeconomic vulnerability, but not objective poverty, is linked to interoception through perceived stress

David Huepe, Daniel Franco-O’Byrne, Jorge Eduardo Ferdman
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Perceived socioeconomic vulnerability, but not objective poverty, is linked to interoception through perceived stress

David Huepe, Daniel Franco-O’Byrne, Jorge Eduardo Ferdman
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Socioeconomic vulnerability is associated with higher levels of stress and adverse effects on physical, mental, and cognitive health. However, its influence on interoceptive awareness-defined as the perception, interpretation, and regulation of bodily signals-remains underexplored. This study examined the relationships between objective (multidimensional poverty) and subjective (perceived vulnerability) measures of socioeconomic vulnerability, perceived stress, and interoceptive awareness, as well as the mediating role of stress. Methods: A total of 104 adults (50 women, 54 men; aged 30-45 years; mean schooling = 14.7 years) completed self-report measures of perceived vulnerability, perceived stress, and interoceptive awareness using the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). Results: Perceived vulnerability, but not multidimensional poverty, was negatively associated with interoceptive awareness, both at the total MAIA score level and across subscales. Furthermore, perceived stress partially mediated the association between perceived vulnerability and interoceptive awareness. Discussion: These findings suggest that the subjective perception of socioeconomic vulnerability may impair the ability to attend to and consciously use bodily signals through psycho-affective and cognitive mechanisms. This complements physiological models linking socioeconomic experiences with interoceptive processes, highlighting the relevance of subjective vulnerability in shaping interoceptive functioning.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Adolfo Ibáñez University (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.