Deepfaking the past: Memory and perceived truth of resurrected historical figures

Deepfakes have intensified fears about the power of synthetic media to reshape historical memory and blur the boundaries between truth and fabrication. This study compares how audiences process historical narratives presented by deepfaked figures and in the form of written text, focusing on differences in recall and perceived truth over time. In an online experiment, 332 U.S. participants read or watched first-person accounts by Albert Einstein or Marie Curie across two sessions one week apart. Written narratives produced higher recall and stronger perceived truth than deepfake videos, both immediately and one week later. Also, Need for Cognition predicted greater perceived truth across conditions, suggesting that analytic engagement rather than technological realism drives belief in mediated representations. Although perceived truth declined over time, the drop was steeper for deepfake messages. Age also emerged as a significant predictor of some measures of perceived truth and recall. Pairwise comparisons between age groups showed progressive increases with participants aged 18–29 displaying the weakest recall and truth ratings, whereas those aged 30 and above maintained stronger and more stable judgments over time, independent of analytic motivation. These findings indicate that analytically engaged audiences are resilient to synthetic realism, limiting the potential for deepfakes to distort historical understanding. • Deepfake videos produced lower recall accuracy than equivalent text narratives. • Written accounts were judged as more truthful than their deepfake counterparts. • Deepfakes prompted greater skepticism despite their audiovisual realism. • Memory and perceived truth decayed faster for deepfakes than for text messages. • Text modality fostered deeper processing and more stable truth judgments than deepfakes. • These findings challenge assumptions that audiovisual realism in deepfakes enhances credibility. • Deepfaking the Past: Memory and Perceived Truth of Resurrected Historical Figures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2026.109008
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deepfaking the past: Memory and perceived truth of resurrected historical figures

Gina Junhan Fu, María T. Soto-Sanfiel
Computers in Human Behavior
Media Influence and Health
article

Deepfaking the past: Memory and perceived truth of resurrected historical figures

Gina Junhan Fu, María T. Soto-Sanfiel
article en

Abstract

Deepfakes have intensified fears about the power of synthetic media to reshape historical memory and blur the boundaries between truth and fabrication. This study compares how audiences process historical narratives presented by deepfaked figures and in the form of written text, focusing on differences in recall and perceived truth over time. In an online experiment, 332 U.S. participants read or watched first-person accounts by Albert Einstein or Marie Curie across two sessions one week apart. Written narratives produced higher recall and stronger perceived truth than deepfake videos, both immediately and one week later. Also, Need for Cognition predicted greater perceived truth across conditions, suggesting that analytic engagement rather than technological realism drives belief in mediated representations. Although perceived truth declined over time, the drop was steeper for deepfake messages. Age also emerged as a significant predictor of some measures of perceived truth and recall. Pairwise comparisons between age groups showed progressive increases with participants aged 18–29 displaying the weakest recall and truth ratings, whereas those aged 30 and above maintained stronger and more stable judgments over time, independent of analytic motivation. These findings indicate that analytically engaged audiences are resilient to synthetic realism, limiting the potential for deepfakes to distort historical understanding. • Deepfake videos produced lower recall accuracy than equivalent text narratives. • Written accounts were judged as more truthful than their deepfake counterparts. • Deepfakes prompted greater skepticism despite their audiovisual realism. • Memory and perceived truth decayed faster for deepfakes than for text messages. • Text modality fostered deeper processing and more stable truth judgments than deepfakes. • These findings challenge assumptions that audiovisual realism in deepfakes enhances credibility. • Deepfaking the Past: Memory and Perceived Truth of Resurrected Historical Figures.

Computers in Human BehaviorVol. 182
National University of Singapore (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deepfaking the past: Memory and perceived truth of resurrected historical figures — Gina Junhan Fu, María T. Soto-Sanfiel · Computers in Human Behavior (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS