Single-item measures in digital mental healthcare: a mini narrative review of challenges and opportunities

Single-item measures (SIMs) are increasingly used by digital mental health services for assessment, outcome monitoring, and population-level surveillance. Their simplicity offers clear advantages, including good face validity, practical efficiency, and the potential to integrate across digital platforms. However, concerns persist regarding their reliability and suitability for complex psychological constructs. This mini narrative review synthesises recent literature examining the use of SIMs in mental healthcare over the past decade. A total of 31 articles underwent full-text review, and key themes were identified. Findings suggest that SIMs demonstrate acceptable validity for narrowly defined constructs and are valuable for large-scale screening and digital integration, though systematic validation across diverse populations is essential. These results suggest that SIMs should not replace comprehensive assessments, but they can complement integrated, person-centred models of measurement in digital mental healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Digital Health
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1761107
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single-item measures in digital mental healthcare: a mini narrative review of challenges and opportunities

Blake Farran Dear, Olav Nielssen, Alana Fisher, Nickolai Titov et al.
Frontiers in Digital Health
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Single-item measures in digital mental healthcare: a mini narrative review of challenges and opportunities

Blake Farran Dear, Olav Nielssen, Alana Fisher, Nickolai Titov, Lauren Staples
article en

Abstract

Single-item measures (SIMs) are increasingly used by digital mental health services for assessment, outcome monitoring, and population-level surveillance. Their simplicity offers clear advantages, including good face validity, practical efficiency, and the potential to integrate across digital platforms. However, concerns persist regarding their reliability and suitability for complex psychological constructs. This mini narrative review synthesises recent literature examining the use of SIMs in mental healthcare over the past decade. A total of 31 articles underwent full-text review, and key themes were identified. Findings suggest that SIMs demonstrate acceptable validity for narrowly defined constructs and are valuable for large-scale screening and digital integration, though systematic validation across diverse populations is essential. These results suggest that SIMs should not replace comprehensive assessments, but they can complement integrated, person-centred models of measurement in digital mental healthcare.

Frontiers in Digital HealthVol. 8
Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.