Making the Invisible Visible: A Systematic Review of Mental Models in Chemistry Education

This systematic literature review analyzes 22 studies on mental models in chemistry education published between 2013 and 2022. Findings reveal a growing research interest, particularly since 2015, with a strong geographical concentration in Asia – most notably Indonesia – likely linked to the implementation of the 2013 curriculum (K-13) (Machali, 2014). The reviewed studies vary methodologically: More than half were basic investigations exploring the structure, composition, and misconceptions of mental models (Seel, 2014), while others implemented interventions using dynamic simulations (Akaygun, 2016a; Akaygun, 2016b) or evaluated diagnostic tools (Chiang and Chiu, 2015). Qualitative and mixed-method approaches dominate, especially semi-structured interviews (Döring and Bortz, 2016; Greca and Moreira, 1997). The studies primarily address fundamental chemistry concepts such as bonding, atomic structure, and acidbase reactions (Yildirir and Demirkol, 2018). Results indicate that dynamic visualizations, attention to the three representational levels (Albaiti et al., 2022; Murni et al., 2022), and motivational factors positively influence mental model development, while misconceptions impede it (Putri and Wiyarsi, 2022; Buckley, 2000). The review concludes that methodological diversity is essential for a comprehensive understanding. Future research should refine theoretical frameworks, evaluate innovative digital approaches, and further investigate mechanisms influencing mental model formation to enhance chemistry learning outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science education international
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v37.i1.2
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making the Invisible Visible: A Systematic Review of Mental Models in Chemistry Education

Rüdiger Tiemann, Anna-Lena Nitsche
Science education international
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Making the Invisible Visible: A Systematic Review of Mental Models in Chemistry Education

Rüdiger Tiemann, Anna-Lena Nitsche
article en

Abstract

This systematic literature review analyzes 22 studies on mental models in chemistry education published between 2013 and 2022. Findings reveal a growing research interest, particularly since 2015, with a strong geographical concentration in Asia – most notably Indonesia – likely linked to the implementation of the 2013 curriculum (K-13) (Machali, 2014). The reviewed studies vary methodologically: More than half were basic investigations exploring the structure, composition, and misconceptions of mental models (Seel, 2014), while others implemented interventions using dynamic simulations (Akaygun, 2016a; Akaygun, 2016b) or evaluated diagnostic tools (Chiang and Chiu, 2015). Qualitative and mixed-method approaches dominate, especially semi-structured interviews (Döring and Bortz, 2016; Greca and Moreira, 1997). The studies primarily address fundamental chemistry concepts such as bonding, atomic structure, and acidbase reactions (Yildirir and Demirkol, 2018). Results indicate that dynamic visualizations, attention to the three representational levels (Albaiti et al., 2022; Murni et al., 2022), and motivational factors positively influence mental model development, while misconceptions impede it (Putri and Wiyarsi, 2022; Buckley, 2000). The review concludes that methodological diversity is essential for a comprehensive understanding. Future research should refine theoretical frameworks, evaluate innovative digital approaches, and further investigate mechanisms influencing mental model formation to enhance chemistry learning outcomes.

Science education internationalVol. 37(1)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.