Safety and effectiveness of hormonal vs non-hormonal or no contraception in women with hypertension and future fertility desire: A broad-scope systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives compared to non-hormonal methods or no contraception in hypertensive women seeking future fertility. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and LILACS (September -October, 2022), with updates on September, 2023, and August, 2024. Clinical trial records, regulatory agencies, and gray literature were also consulted (June, 2022; August, 2023; September, 2024). METHODS: Eligible studies that assessed safety (major adverse cardiovascular events, pelvic inflammatory disease, vaginal infections, loss of fertility, discontinuation, worsening hypertension, peripheral arterial disease, venous thromboembolism, weight gain, liver or kidney function changes) or effectiveness (pregnancies/Pearl index) of hormonal contraceptives in hypertensive women. Eligible designs included clinical trials, cohort and case control studies, case series, case reports, and adverse event data. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts, reviewed full texts, selected studies, extracted data, and assessed bias (ROBINS-I: cohorts), methodological quality (Newcastle Ottawa: case-control), and critical appraisal (Joanna Briggs Institute: case series). Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Evidence was synthesized quantitatively and qualitatively by contraceptive and outcome. RESULTS: Of 32,225 records screened, 17 studies were included. Combined oral contraceptives may increase hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease (OR: 1.64 (95% CI 1.08-2.50, certainty: low). Evidence is very uncertain about their effects on preventing pregnancies, and safety related to ischemic cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, weight gain, hypertension, kidney function, and lipid profile. Similarly, the effects of progestin-only pills, injectables, and vaginal rings on cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes remain highly uncertain. Certainty is also very low for combined oral contraceptives or progestogen-only pills regarding cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction (OR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.60-2.19), and peripheral arterial disease. CONCLUSIONS: Low-certainty evidence suggests that combined oral contraceptives may increase hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease in hypertensive women, whereas evidence for the other assessed safety and effectiveness outcomes is very low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345959
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and effectiveness of hormonal vs non-hormonal or no contraception in women with hypertension and future fertility desire: A broad-scope systematic review

Kelly Estrada-Orozco, Alvaro Javier Burgos-Cardenas, Paula Andrea González-Caicedo, Brahiam Alejandro Ramirez-Vargas et al.
PLoS ONE
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Safety and effectiveness of hormonal vs non-hormonal or no contraception in women with hypertension and future fertility desire: A broad-scope systematic review

Kelly Estrada-Orozco, Alvaro Javier Burgos-Cardenas, Paula Andrea González-Caicedo, Brahiam Alejandro Ramirez-Vargas, Hernando Gaitan-Duarte, Natalia Losada-Trujillo, María José Hoyos Bedoya, Oscar Julián Velasco-Lancheros
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives compared to non-hormonal methods or no contraception in hypertensive women seeking future fertility. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and LILACS (September -October, 2022), with updates on September, 2023, and August, 2024. Clinical trial records, regulatory agencies, and gray literature were also consulted (June, 2022; August, 2023; September, 2024). METHODS: Eligible studies that assessed safety (major adverse cardiovascular events, pelvic inflammatory disease, vaginal infections, loss of fertility, discontinuation, worsening hypertension, peripheral arterial disease, venous thromboembolism, weight gain, liver or kidney function changes) or effectiveness (pregnancies/Pearl index) of hormonal contraceptives in hypertensive women. Eligible designs included clinical trials, cohort and case control studies, case series, case reports, and adverse event data. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts, reviewed full texts, selected studies, extracted data, and assessed bias (ROBINS-I: cohorts), methodological quality (Newcastle Ottawa: case-control), and critical appraisal (Joanna Briggs Institute: case series). Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Evidence was synthesized quantitatively and qualitatively by contraceptive and outcome. RESULTS: Of 32,225 records screened, 17 studies were included. Combined oral contraceptives may increase hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease (OR: 1.64 (95% CI 1.08-2.50, certainty: low). Evidence is very uncertain about their effects on preventing pregnancies, and safety related to ischemic cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, weight gain, hypertension, kidney function, and lipid profile. Similarly, the effects of progestin-only pills, injectables, and vaginal rings on cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes remain highly uncertain. Certainty is also very low for combined oral contraceptives or progestogen-only pills regarding cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction (OR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.60-2.19), and peripheral arterial disease. CONCLUSIONS: Low-certainty evidence suggests that combined oral contraceptives may increase hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease in hypertensive women, whereas evidence for the other assessed safety and effectiveness outcomes is very low.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(3)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO), Asociación Colombiana de Diabetes (CO), Institute of Cardiology (CO), Colombian Geological Survey (CO), Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia (CO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.