Dual-factor model of mental health: a latent profile and network analysis approach among Vietnamese people

Purpose Mental health research has increasingly adopted dual-factor models that distinguish between psychopathology and well-being. In Southeast Asia, particularly Vietnam, limited empirical attention has been given to the interplay among anxiety, depression and well-being in populations. This study aims to identify distinct mental health profiles among Vietnamese adults and examine how the structural relationships between psychopathological symptoms and well-being indicators differ across these profiles using network analysis. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,105 Vietnamese adults (aged 18–64). Latent class analysis was employed to classify participants into mental health subgroups based on psychopathology and well-being. Subsequently, network analysis was used to visualize and compare the relationships between nodes within each latent class. Findings Three latent classes emerged: a “troubled” group (high psychopathology, low well-being), a “vulnerable” group (moderate psychopathology, low well-being) and a “complete mental health” group (low psychopathology, high well-being). Network analysis showed that the troubled group had a dense, exclusively positive structure dominated by tightly interconnected anxiety and depression, and well-being nodes were also central but weakly connected across domains, indicating coexisting distress and diminished positive functioning without inhibitory regulation. The vulnerable group was characterized by high centrality of psychopathological symptoms and fragmented well-being. In contrast, the complete mental health group was characterized by the highest centrality concentrated in well-being nodes. Originality/value This study provides empirical support for the dual-factor model of mental health and highlights class-specific network patterns that underscore the importance of both well-being and psychopathology in determining mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mental Health and Social Inclusion
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-02-2026-0064
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual-factor model of mental health: a latent profile and network analysis approach among Vietnamese people

Thuy Chi Tran
Mental Health and Social Inclusion
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Dual-factor model of mental health: a latent profile and network analysis approach among Vietnamese people

Thuy Chi Tran
article en

Abstract

Purpose Mental health research has increasingly adopted dual-factor models that distinguish between psychopathology and well-being. In Southeast Asia, particularly Vietnam, limited empirical attention has been given to the interplay among anxiety, depression and well-being in populations. This study aims to identify distinct mental health profiles among Vietnamese adults and examine how the structural relationships between psychopathological symptoms and well-being indicators differ across these profiles using network analysis. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,105 Vietnamese adults (aged 18–64). Latent class analysis was employed to classify participants into mental health subgroups based on psychopathology and well-being. Subsequently, network analysis was used to visualize and compare the relationships between nodes within each latent class. Findings Three latent classes emerged: a “troubled” group (high psychopathology, low well-being), a “vulnerable” group (moderate psychopathology, low well-being) and a “complete mental health” group (low psychopathology, high well-being). Network analysis showed that the troubled group had a dense, exclusively positive structure dominated by tightly interconnected anxiety and depression, and well-being nodes were also central but weakly connected across domains, indicating coexisting distress and diminished positive functioning without inhibitory regulation. The vulnerable group was characterized by high centrality of psychopathological symptoms and fragmented well-being. In contrast, the complete mental health group was characterized by the highest centrality concentrated in well-being nodes. Originality/value This study provides empirical support for the dual-factor model of mental health and highlights class-specific network patterns that underscore the importance of both well-being and psychopathology in determining mental health.

Mental Health and Social Inclusion
Ural Federal University (RU), Ho Chi Minh City Open University (VN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dual-factor model of mental health: a latent profile and network analysis approach among Vietnamese people — Thuy Chi Tran · Mental Health and Social Inclusion (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS