Mindfulness and hope: distinct yet complementary relationships with psychological well-being

Mindfulness and hope are both associated with well-being, yet their orientations—present-focused awareness versus future-directed striving—are seemingly at odds. Moreover, limited research addresses them simultaneously. We investigated the relationship between mindfulness and hope, assessing their associations with psychological well-being. A cross-sectional survey of 145 undergraduates (Mage = 18.83; 112 women, 32 men, 1 unreported) tested the degree to which each construct was associated with measures of depression, anxiety, stress, life satisfaction, optimism, sense of control, and executive functioning. Mindfulness was assessed using the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, hope using the State Hope Scale, and well-being using various validated self-report measures. Mindfulness and hope, although not correlated with each other (r = .05, p = .56), were independently associated with many of these measures. Additionally, mindfulness was uniquely associated with anxiety (β = − 0.48), disinhibition (β = − 0.41), and negative-assertive control (β = − 0.39), whereas hope was uniquely associated with life satisfaction (β = 0.25) and positive-assertive control (β = 0.39). The shared variance jointly associated with both mindfulness and hope across all well-being measures was minimal (≤ 1.8%). Mindfulness and hope appear to be distinct constructs that independently relate to psychological well-being. Their unique associations suggest complementary, rather than conflicting or redundant, roles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46370-8
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mindfulness and hope: distinct yet complementary relationships with psychological well-being

Diane E. Dreher, Shauna L. Shapiro, David B. Feldman
Scientific Reports
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Mindfulness and hope: distinct yet complementary relationships with psychological well-being

Diane E. Dreher, Shauna L. Shapiro, David B. Feldman
article en

Abstract

Mindfulness and hope are both associated with well-being, yet their orientations—present-focused awareness versus future-directed striving—are seemingly at odds. Moreover, limited research addresses them simultaneously. We investigated the relationship between mindfulness and hope, assessing their associations with psychological well-being. A cross-sectional survey of 145 undergraduates (Mage = 18.83; 112 women, 32 men, 1 unreported) tested the degree to which each construct was associated with measures of depression, anxiety, stress, life satisfaction, optimism, sense of control, and executive functioning. Mindfulness was assessed using the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, hope using the State Hope Scale, and well-being using various validated self-report measures. Mindfulness and hope, although not correlated with each other (r = .05, p = .56), were independently associated with many of these measures. Additionally, mindfulness was uniquely associated with anxiety (β = − 0.48), disinhibition (β = − 0.41), and negative-assertive control (β = − 0.39), whereas hope was uniquely associated with life satisfaction (β = 0.25) and positive-assertive control (β = 0.39). The shared variance jointly associated with both mindfulness and hope across all well-being measures was minimal (≤ 1.8%). Mindfulness and hope appear to be distinct constructs that independently relate to psychological well-being. Their unique associations suggest complementary, rather than conflicting or redundant, roles.

Scientific Reports
Chulalongkorn University (TH), Santa Clara University (US)
Santa Clara University
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.