Beyond averages: Situational lesson to lesson level interplay between relatedness and competence

Although relatedness and competence are central psychological needs for students' motivation and well-being, their moment-to-moment variation in classrooms remains underexplored. This study examined fluctuations in adolescents' experiences of relatedness and competence across a school week using intensive longitudinal data from 118 secondary school students (average of 21 responses per student). Multilevel dynamic structural equation models showed that most variance was situational, with 30–40% reflecting stable between-person differences. Subject-specific patterns emerged, as experiences differed across school subjects. Prior relatedness predicted both subsequent relatedness and competence, suggesting that social connection can foster academic confidence. Conversely, prior competence slightly reduced later relatedness satisfaction and increased relatedness frustration, indicating a potential trade-off with social engagement. Additionally, the number of peers per lesson predicted greater relatedness satisfaction and lower frustration. These findings underscore the value of capturing motivational dynamics at the situational level and tailoring support to both academic and social needs. Our study shows that students' feelings of social connection (relatedness) and confidence in their abilities (competence) can change from lesson to lesson. We found that when students felt more socially connected in one lesson, they tended to feel more confident in the next. Interestingly, feeling confident sometimes made students feel less socially connected later, especially for those students who usually felt well connected. These findings help us understand the everyday ups and downs of students' motivation and suggest that supporting both academic and social needs in the classroom is important. Schools and teachers can use this knowledge to better support students by creating learning environments that balance academic challenges with the opportunities for social connection. • Relatedness and competence vary considerably across daily classroom lessons • Prior relatedness satisfaction predicts later competence • Prior competence can decrease relatedness satisfaction and increase loneliness • Subject-specific patterns emerge in momentary motivational experiences • Findings underscore the value of modeling intraindividual motivational dynamics

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102911
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond averages: Situational lesson to lesson level interplay between relatedness and competence

Anna Maria Rawlings, Risto Hotulainen, Lars‐Erik Malmberg, Satu Koivuhovi
Learning and Individual Differences
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Beyond averages: Situational lesson to lesson level interplay between relatedness and competence

Anna Maria Rawlings, Risto Hotulainen, Lars‐Erik Malmberg, Satu Koivuhovi
article en

Abstract

Although relatedness and competence are central psychological needs for students' motivation and well-being, their moment-to-moment variation in classrooms remains underexplored. This study examined fluctuations in adolescents' experiences of relatedness and competence across a school week using intensive longitudinal data from 118 secondary school students (average of 21 responses per student). Multilevel dynamic structural equation models showed that most variance was situational, with 30–40% reflecting stable between-person differences. Subject-specific patterns emerged, as experiences differed across school subjects. Prior relatedness predicted both subsequent relatedness and competence, suggesting that social connection can foster academic confidence. Conversely, prior competence slightly reduced later relatedness satisfaction and increased relatedness frustration, indicating a potential trade-off with social engagement. Additionally, the number of peers per lesson predicted greater relatedness satisfaction and lower frustration. These findings underscore the value of capturing motivational dynamics at the situational level and tailoring support to both academic and social needs. Our study shows that students' feelings of social connection (relatedness) and confidence in their abilities (competence) can change from lesson to lesson. We found that when students felt more socially connected in one lesson, they tended to feel more confident in the next. Interestingly, feeling confident sometimes made students feel less socially connected later, especially for those students who usually felt well connected. These findings help us understand the everyday ups and downs of students' motivation and suggest that supporting both academic and social needs in the classroom is important. Schools and teachers can use this knowledge to better support students by creating learning environments that balance academic challenges with the opportunities for social connection. • Relatedness and competence vary considerably across daily classroom lessons • Prior relatedness satisfaction predicts later competence • Prior competence can decrease relatedness satisfaction and increase loneliness • Subject-specific patterns emerge in momentary motivational experiences • Findings underscore the value of modeling intraindividual motivational dynamics

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 128
Åbo Akademi University (FI), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), University of Oxford (GB), Finland University (FI)
Opetus- ja Kulttuuriministeriö
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.