Sequential Monopolar-bipolar Versus Monopolar Radiofrequency: A Cross-sectional Survey on Patient Satisfaction

Background: Radiofrequency (RF) technologies are widely used for non-invasive facial rejuvenation. While monopolar RF (M-RF) provides deeper tissue heating, monopolar-bipolar RF (MB-RF) platforms aim to target multiple dermal depths to improve both contouring and surface texture. Real-world patient satisfaction data on MB-RF remain limited. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted at cosmetic dermatology facilities in Ho Chi Minh City (March-July 2025). Adults (≥18 years) undergoing MB-RF with the DENSITY NOIR device were enrolled. Participants rated improvements in firmness/contouring, pore appearance, skin tone and wrinkles at one-week and one-month post-treatment. Overall satisfaction, comfort and willingness to repeat the treatment were recorded. A planned subgroup analysis was performed for participants with prior M-RF experience. Results: Of 130 participants, 31 (23.9%) had previously undergone M-RF. MB-RF achieved 63.1–64.6% satisfaction for firmness/contouring with texture-related satisfaction ranged from 60.8%–62.3%. Overall satisfaction was 69.2%, with low discomfort (2.3%). Subgroup analysis showed no significant efficacy differences between MB-RF and prior M-RF, but MB-RF was significantly more comfortable and preferred for reuse. Conclusion: MB-RF (DENSITY NOIR) provides high patient satisfaction with strong tolerability and comparable efficacy to prior M-RF, positioning it as a patient-preferred non-invasive rejuvenation option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30499240261433408
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sequential Monopolar-bipolar Versus Monopolar Radiofrequency: A Cross-sectional Survey on Patient Satisfaction

Hoang Thien Minh Tri
International Journal of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

Sequential Monopolar-bipolar Versus Monopolar Radiofrequency: A Cross-sectional Survey on Patient Satisfaction

Hoang Thien Minh Tri
article en

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency (RF) technologies are widely used for non-invasive facial rejuvenation. While monopolar RF (M-RF) provides deeper tissue heating, monopolar-bipolar RF (MB-RF) platforms aim to target multiple dermal depths to improve both contouring and surface texture. Real-world patient satisfaction data on MB-RF remain limited. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted at cosmetic dermatology facilities in Ho Chi Minh City (March-July 2025). Adults (≥18 years) undergoing MB-RF with the DENSITY NOIR device were enrolled. Participants rated improvements in firmness/contouring, pore appearance, skin tone and wrinkles at one-week and one-month post-treatment. Overall satisfaction, comfort and willingness to repeat the treatment were recorded. A planned subgroup analysis was performed for participants with prior M-RF experience. Results: Of 130 participants, 31 (23.9%) had previously undergone M-RF. MB-RF achieved 63.1–64.6% satisfaction for firmness/contouring with texture-related satisfaction ranged from 60.8%–62.3%. Overall satisfaction was 69.2%, with low discomfort (2.3%). Subgroup analysis showed no significant efficacy differences between MB-RF and prior M-RF, but MB-RF was significantly more comfortable and preferred for reuse. Conclusion: MB-RF (DENSITY NOIR) provides high patient satisfaction with strong tolerability and comparable efficacy to prior M-RF, positioning it as a patient-preferred non-invasive rejuvenation option.

International Journal of Aesthetic Plastic SurgeryVol. 2(1)
HCMC Hospital of Dermato Venereology (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.