Oncological Outcomes and Treatment Strategies for Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on the Oncological Resectability Classification

Background: Although hepatic resection is the most effective curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in selected patients, survival outcomes can vary significantly depending on tumor burden and biology. To provide a standardized framework, the oncological resectability classification introduced in 2023 stratifies patients into resectable (R), borderline resectable 1 (BR1), or borderline resectable 2 (BR2). However, the optimal management of patients with BR1 and BR2 in the era of novel systemic therapies remains uncertain. The present study evaluated the surgical validity and treatment strategies for patients with BR1 and BR2, based on this classification. Methods: = 14). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the impact of vascular invasion and preoperative systemic therapy. Results: < 0.001). Among BR1 patients without vascular invasion, no cancer-related deaths occurred, and recurrence was largely controllable with repeated hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, or stereotactic radiotherapy in patients even with recurrence. Conversely, BR1 patients with vascular invasion who underwent upfront surgery exhibited poor survival outcomes, whereas those received preoperative systemic therapy demonstrated at least comparable survival outcomes despite a higher tumor burden, with a lower incidence of cancer-related death. BR2 patients had uniformly poor results regardless of vascular invasion. However, two cases who received systemic therapy before surgery achieved a long-term survival, including one with complete pathological necrosis. Conclusions: BR1 patients, particularly those without vascular invasion, may achieve survival comparable to that of R. In contrast, BR2 patients generally show dismal outcomes with surgery alone, underscoring the necessity of systemic or multimodal approaches. Tailored strategies are essential for optimizing outcomes in patients with borderline resectable HCC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Cancer
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000551047
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oncological Outcomes and Treatment Strategies for Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on the Oncological Resectability Classification

Ryu Sasaki, Ayaka Satoh, Kazushige Migita, Ayaka Kinoshita et al.
Liver Cancer
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Oncological Outcomes and Treatment Strategies for Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on the Oncological Resectability Classification

Ryu Sasaki, Ayaka Satoh, Kazushige Migita, Ayaka Kinoshita, Kohki Kurotaki, Susumu Eguchi, Shun Nakamura, Takashi Hamada, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Akihiko Soyama, Hajime Matsushima, Tomohiko Adachi, Hajime Imamura
article en

Abstract

Background: Although hepatic resection is the most effective curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in selected patients, survival outcomes can vary significantly depending on tumor burden and biology. To provide a standardized framework, the oncological resectability classification introduced in 2023 stratifies patients into resectable (R), borderline resectable 1 (BR1), or borderline resectable 2 (BR2). However, the optimal management of patients with BR1 and BR2 in the era of novel systemic therapies remains uncertain. The present study evaluated the surgical validity and treatment strategies for patients with BR1 and BR2, based on this classification. Methods: = 14). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the impact of vascular invasion and preoperative systemic therapy. Results: < 0.001). Among BR1 patients without vascular invasion, no cancer-related deaths occurred, and recurrence was largely controllable with repeated hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, or stereotactic radiotherapy in patients even with recurrence. Conversely, BR1 patients with vascular invasion who underwent upfront surgery exhibited poor survival outcomes, whereas those received preoperative systemic therapy demonstrated at least comparable survival outcomes despite a higher tumor burden, with a lower incidence of cancer-related death. BR2 patients had uniformly poor results regardless of vascular invasion. However, two cases who received systemic therapy before surgery achieved a long-term survival, including one with complete pathological necrosis. Conclusions: BR1 patients, particularly those without vascular invasion, may achieve survival comparable to that of R. In contrast, BR2 patients generally show dismal outcomes with surgery alone, underscoring the necessity of systemic or multimodal approaches. Tailored strategies are essential for optimizing outcomes in patients with borderline resectable HCC.

Liver Cancer
University of Nagasaki (JP), Nagasaki University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.