The potential of semiconducting oxides in comparison to insulating oxides for memristor applications

Memristors have emerged as promising candidates for next-generation memory, such as storage-class memory, embedded memory, and synaptic devices for neuromorphic computing. Their performance is strongly influenced by intrinsic material properties, particularly the formation and dynamics of defects such as oxygen vacancies. They can also be fabricated by simple methods, which typically result in a material with amorphous phase sandwiched between two metal electrodes. These features have motivated extensive exploration of oxide-based memristive devices across a broad range of material systems. In this perspective, we critically assess diverse literature to compare semiconducting oxide with insulating oxide-based memristors. We evaluated operational voltages, resistance states, and switching types to elucidate the key differences and performance trends associated with these two classes of materials. We anticipate that this perspective will serve as a useful guide for researchers seeking to select or engineer oxide materials tailored to specific memristor applications, from high-density memory to neuromorphic architectures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
APL Materials
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0314546
Primary Topic
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The potential of semiconducting oxides in comparison to insulating oxides for memristor applications

Krishna Rudrapal, Alwin Daus
APL Materials
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
article

The potential of semiconducting oxides in comparison to insulating oxides for memristor applications

Krishna Rudrapal, Alwin Daus
article en

Abstract

Memristors have emerged as promising candidates for next-generation memory, such as storage-class memory, embedded memory, and synaptic devices for neuromorphic computing. Their performance is strongly influenced by intrinsic material properties, particularly the formation and dynamics of defects such as oxygen vacancies. They can also be fabricated by simple methods, which typically result in a material with amorphous phase sandwiched between two metal electrodes. These features have motivated extensive exploration of oxide-based memristive devices across a broad range of material systems. In this perspective, we critically assess diverse literature to compare semiconducting oxide with insulating oxide-based memristors. We evaluated operational voltages, resistance states, and switching types to elucidate the key differences and performance trends associated with these two classes of materials. We anticipate that this perspective will serve as a useful guide for researchers seeking to select or engineer oxide materials tailored to specific memristor applications, from high-density memory to neuromorphic architectures.

APL MaterialsVol. 14(4)
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Volkswagen Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.