Why the Casimir Force for Magnetic Metals Computed by the Lifshitz Theory Using the Drude Model Disagrees with the Measurement Data

We consider the Casimir force in configurations with magnetic metal plates and analyze the reasons why the predictions of the Lifshitz theory using the dielectric permittivity of the Drude model are inconsistent with the measurement data. For this purpose, the contributions of the electromagnetic waves with the transverse magnetic and transverse electric polarizations to the Casimir force are computed using the Lifshitz theory expressed in terms of the pure imaginary Matsubara frequencies. Furthermore, the fractions of the evanescent and propagating waves in these contributions are found using the equivalent formulation of the Lifshitz theory along the real frequency axis. All computations are performed for Au–Ni and Ni–Ni plates using the Drude model and the experimentally consistent plasma model over the separation region from 0.5 to 6 μm, where the total force value is determined by the conduction electrons. It is shown that the transverse magnetic contribution to the Casimir force does not depend on the model of the dielectric permittivity used, allowing the total difference between the predictions of the Lifshitz theory using the Drude model and the measurement data to be determined by the transverse electric contribution. In doing so, as opposed to the case of nonmagnetic metals, both fractions of the evanescent and propagating waves in this contribution depend on the model of the dielectric permittivity used in computations, whereas the magnetic properties of the plate metal influence the Casimir force solely through the fraction of the propagating waves in the transverse electric contribution. The issue of a more adequate theoretical description of the electromagnetic response of magnetic metals is discussed.

Publication Details

Journal
Physics
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/physics8020033
Primary Topic
Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why the Casimir Force for Magnetic Metals Computed by the Lifshitz Theory Using the Drude Model Disagrees with the Measurement Data

Physics
Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
article

Why the Casimir Force for Magnetic Metals Computed by the Lifshitz Theory Using the Drude Model Disagrees with the Measurement Data

article en

Abstract

We consider the Casimir force in configurations with magnetic metal plates and analyze the reasons why the predictions of the Lifshitz theory using the dielectric permittivity of the Drude model are inconsistent with the measurement data. For this purpose, the contributions of the electromagnetic waves with the transverse magnetic and transverse electric polarizations to the Casimir force are computed using the Lifshitz theory expressed in terms of the pure imaginary Matsubara frequencies. Furthermore, the fractions of the evanescent and propagating waves in these contributions are found using the equivalent formulation of the Lifshitz theory along the real frequency axis. All computations are performed for Au–Ni and Ni–Ni plates using the Drude model and the experimentally consistent plasma model over the separation region from 0.5 to 6 μm, where the total force value is determined by the conduction electrons. It is shown that the transverse magnetic contribution to the Casimir force does not depend on the model of the dielectric permittivity used, allowing the total difference between the predictions of the Lifshitz theory using the Drude model and the measurement data to be determined by the transverse electric contribution. In doing so, as opposed to the case of nonmagnetic metals, both fractions of the evanescent and propagating waves in this contribution depend on the model of the dielectric permittivity used in computations, whereas the magnetic properties of the plate metal influence the Casimir force solely through the fraction of the propagating waves in the transverse electric contribution. The issue of a more adequate theoretical description of the electromagnetic response of magnetic metals is discussed.

PhysicsVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why the Casimir Force for Magnetic Metals Computed by the Lifshitz Theory Using the Drude Model Disagrees with the Measurement Data · Physics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS