Effect of nature-based interventions on depressive symptoms and cognitive functions in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Depression and cognitive decline represent critical challenges in aging populations. Although nature-based interventions (NBIs) show promise in mitigating these conditions, current evidence regarding their efficacy remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis synthesized randomized controlled trials comparing NBIs against controls in adults aged ≥ 65 years. Seven databases were searched through 30 May 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean differences, with heterogeneity assessed via I 2 statistics and Q tests. A total of 19 studies involving 1,149 older adults were included. Pooled analyses demonstrated that NBIs significantly reduced depressive symptoms ( k = 13, SMD = −0.35, 95% CI: [−0.51, −0.19]; p < 0.001) and enhanced cognitive functions ( k = 10, SMD = 0.78, 95% CI: [0.55, 1.02]; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested that spring-based NBIs conferred superior benefits compared to autumn, while higher intervention frequency (≥ 2/week) was associated with greater cognitive gains. Regarding intervention types, although between-subgroup differences were non-significant, significant improvements were observed specifically for horticultural activities and mixed NBIs, whereas other intervention types did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, NBIs represent effective non-pharmacological strategies for alleviating depressive symptoms and enhancing cognitive functions in older adults. Optimizing intervention design may maximize therapeutic gains. These findings support integrating NBIs into geriatric care, though future high-quality research with larger sample sizes is needed to strengthen current evidence and confirm these optimal parameters. PROSPERO CRD420251045110. • First meta-analysis assessing the effects of nature-based interventions (NBIs) on depressive symptoms and cognitive function in older adults. • Evidence from 19 randomized controlled trials confirms NBIs effectively alleviate depressive symptoms and improve cognitive function. • NBIs conducted in spring demonstrate superior efficacy compared to those implemented in autumn. • Higher intervention frequency (≥ 2 sessions/week) is associated with greater cognitive gains in older adults. • Further high-quality evidence is required to confirm moderators and optimize personalized NBI strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.103023
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of nature-based interventions on depressive symptoms and cognitive functions in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Di Tang, Fan Sun
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Effect of nature-based interventions on depressive symptoms and cognitive functions in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Di Tang, Fan Sun
article en

Abstract

Depression and cognitive decline represent critical challenges in aging populations. Although nature-based interventions (NBIs) show promise in mitigating these conditions, current evidence regarding their efficacy remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis synthesized randomized controlled trials comparing NBIs against controls in adults aged ≥ 65 years. Seven databases were searched through 30 May 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean differences, with heterogeneity assessed via I 2 statistics and Q tests. A total of 19 studies involving 1,149 older adults were included. Pooled analyses demonstrated that NBIs significantly reduced depressive symptoms ( k = 13, SMD = −0.35, 95% CI: [−0.51, −0.19]; p < 0.001) and enhanced cognitive functions ( k = 10, SMD = 0.78, 95% CI: [0.55, 1.02]; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested that spring-based NBIs conferred superior benefits compared to autumn, while higher intervention frequency (≥ 2/week) was associated with greater cognitive gains. Regarding intervention types, although between-subgroup differences were non-significant, significant improvements were observed specifically for horticultural activities and mixed NBIs, whereas other intervention types did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, NBIs represent effective non-pharmacological strategies for alleviating depressive symptoms and enhancing cognitive functions in older adults. Optimizing intervention design may maximize therapeutic gains. These findings support integrating NBIs into geriatric care, though future high-quality research with larger sample sizes is needed to strengthen current evidence and confirm these optimal parameters. PROSPERO CRD420251045110. • First meta-analysis assessing the effects of nature-based interventions (NBIs) on depressive symptoms and cognitive function in older adults. • Evidence from 19 randomized controlled trials confirms NBIs effectively alleviate depressive symptoms and improve cognitive function. • NBIs conducted in spring demonstrate superior efficacy compared to those implemented in autumn. • Higher intervention frequency (≥ 2 sessions/week) is associated with greater cognitive gains in older adults. • Further high-quality evidence is required to confirm moderators and optimize personalized NBI strategies.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 111
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Communication University of China, Nanjing, Communication University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.