Comparative applied craniofacial morphometry in popular brachycephalic breeds: A tool for preventive medicine and risk stratification

Brachycephalic dog breeds are globally popular, yet their craniofacial morphometry is rarely quantified in clinical settings. Since each breed possesses distinct traits, individual assessment is crucial. This study aimed to assess and compare cranial features of healthy French Bulldogs (FB), Pugs (P), and Shih Tzus (S), utilizing 25 dogs per breed (n = 75). Morphometric measurements included body weight, muzzle length (ML), skull length (SL), skull width (SW), palpebral fissure length (PFL), relative palpebral fissure length (RPFL), cephalic index (CI), and craniofacial ratio (CFR). Also, Body Weight was computed. All dogs were classified as extreme brachycephalic (CFR < 0.2; CI > 0.81). Significant breed-specific correlations were observed, notably between CFR and SW in FB, CFR and PFL in Pugs, and SL and SW in Shih Tzus. The French Bulldog was the heaviest breed, characterized by the widest skulls and largest palpebral width. Pugs exhibited the lowest CFR and shortest muzzles. These findings emphasize that the brachycephalic phenotype manifests heterogeneously across breeds. Consequently, from a preventive medicine perspective, these breeds cannot be treated as equivalents; clinical assessment and monitoring must be tailored to their specific anatomical profiles. This study provides reference data for clinical use and supports future research into breed-specific craniofacial anatomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Veterinary Science
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106163
Primary Topic
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative applied craniofacial morphometry in popular brachycephalic breeds: A tool for preventive medicine and risk stratification

Paulo Henrique Sampaio da Silva, Paula Diniz Galera, Isabella Torminn Fleury Castanheira
Research in Veterinary Science
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
article

Comparative applied craniofacial morphometry in popular brachycephalic breeds: A tool for preventive medicine and risk stratification

Paulo Henrique Sampaio da Silva, Paula Diniz Galera, Isabella Torminn Fleury Castanheira
article en

Abstract

Brachycephalic dog breeds are globally popular, yet their craniofacial morphometry is rarely quantified in clinical settings. Since each breed possesses distinct traits, individual assessment is crucial. This study aimed to assess and compare cranial features of healthy French Bulldogs (FB), Pugs (P), and Shih Tzus (S), utilizing 25 dogs per breed (n = 75). Morphometric measurements included body weight, muzzle length (ML), skull length (SL), skull width (SW), palpebral fissure length (PFL), relative palpebral fissure length (RPFL), cephalic index (CI), and craniofacial ratio (CFR). Also, Body Weight was computed. All dogs were classified as extreme brachycephalic (CFR < 0.2; CI > 0.81). Significant breed-specific correlations were observed, notably between CFR and SW in FB, CFR and PFL in Pugs, and SL and SW in Shih Tzus. The French Bulldog was the heaviest breed, characterized by the widest skulls and largest palpebral width. Pugs exhibited the lowest CFR and shortest muzzles. These findings emphasize that the brachycephalic phenotype manifests heterogeneously across breeds. Consequently, from a preventive medicine perspective, these breeds cannot be treated as equivalents; clinical assessment and monitoring must be tailored to their specific anatomical profiles. This study provides reference data for clinical use and supports future research into breed-specific craniofacial anatomy.

Research in Veterinary ScienceVol. 205
Universidade de Brasília (BR), Hospital Universitário de Brasília (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.