Disparities in GLP-1 and GIP responses to small intestinal glucose infusion in individuals with well- and poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes

AIMS: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are key regulators of glucose homeostasis in health and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Whether their secretion is influenced by antecedent glycaemic control in T2D remains unclear. This study compared GLP-1 and GIP responses to intraduodenal glucose infusion between individuals with well- and poorly-controlled T2D. METHODS: 24 diet-controlled participants with T2D (n = 12 with HbA1c < 7.0% and n = 12 with HbA1c > 8.5%) received an intraduodenal infusion of 30 g glucose with 3 g 3-O-methylglucose (3-OMG; a marker of intestinal glucose absorption) over 30 min. Blood glucose was maintained comparably (6.4 ± 0.4 vs. 6.1 ± 0.3 mmol/L) by intravenous insulin. Plasma GIP, GLP-1 and C-peptide and serum 3-OMG were measured at frequent intervals. RESULTS: (453.3 ± 110.6 vs. 1037.5 ± 177.1 pmol/L*min, P = 0.01), but this difference became non-significant after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. C-peptide and 3-OMG responses were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Poor glycaemic control in T2D is associated with a greater GIP, and lower GLP-1, response to small intestinal glucose, independent of intestinal glucose absorption. However, differences in GLP-1 may be influenced by age, sex and BMI, so should be interpreted cautiously and validated in larger cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113235
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in GLP-1 and GIP responses to small intestinal glucose infusion in individuals with well- and poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes

Ian Macdonald, M. Horowitz, Richard L. Young, Karen L. Jones et al.
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Disparities in GLP-1 and GIP responses to small intestinal glucose infusion in individuals with well- and poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes

Ian Macdonald, M. Horowitz, Richard L. Young, Karen L. Jones, Cong Xie, Michelle Bound, Yixuan Sun, Tongzhi Wu, Christopher K. Rayner
article en

Abstract

AIMS: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are key regulators of glucose homeostasis in health and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Whether their secretion is influenced by antecedent glycaemic control in T2D remains unclear. This study compared GLP-1 and GIP responses to intraduodenal glucose infusion between individuals with well- and poorly-controlled T2D. METHODS: 24 diet-controlled participants with T2D (n = 12 with HbA1c < 7.0% and n = 12 with HbA1c > 8.5%) received an intraduodenal infusion of 30 g glucose with 3 g 3-O-methylglucose (3-OMG; a marker of intestinal glucose absorption) over 30 min. Blood glucose was maintained comparably (6.4 ± 0.4 vs. 6.1 ± 0.3 mmol/L) by intravenous insulin. Plasma GIP, GLP-1 and C-peptide and serum 3-OMG were measured at frequent intervals. RESULTS: (453.3 ± 110.6 vs. 1037.5 ± 177.1 pmol/L*min, P = 0.01), but this difference became non-significant after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. C-peptide and 3-OMG responses were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Poor glycaemic control in T2D is associated with a greater GIP, and lower GLP-1, response to small intestinal glucose, independent of intestinal glucose absorption. However, differences in GLP-1 may be influenced by age, sex and BMI, so should be interpreted cautiously and validated in larger cohorts.

Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeVol. 236
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), University of Nottingham (GB), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council, Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.