Detection, identification, and localization of faults in PONs using joint OLT and OTDR telemetry data

Passive optical networks (PONs) are a key technology for broadband delivery to residential, enterprise, and industrial internet users. Their increasing deployment in latency-sensitive environments such as manufacturing and data centers raises the importance of fast and reliable fault management. Fiber faults—whether at the telecom operator side like tapping and cutting or on the customer’s side like powered-off or unplugged optical network units (ONUs)—can disrupt service, compromise security, and violate service level agreements (SLAs). Conventional optical time domain reflectometry (OTDR) suffers from limited trace interpretability in high-split PONs, while artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches face challenges of scalability, reproducibility, and explainability. First, we propose a heuristic algorithm that combines optical line terminal (OLT) monitoring data with OTDR traces to detect and localize faults in PONs without requiring expensive reflectors installed at the ONU or lengthy AI training and explainability issues. Then, we benchmark its classification capabilities against multiple state-of-the-art AI algorithms like convolutional neural networks (CNNs), feed forward neural networks (FFNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM), bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), bidirectional gated recurrent units (BiGRUs), and two different gradient boosting models. To conclude the paper, we compare our heuristic algorithm with all the others and highlight the trade-offs in accuracy, scalability, and deployment readiness. The algorithms are validated experimentally, demonstrating identification accuracy up to 90% for both deliberate and non-deliberate faults and localization error with median values below one meter. An experimental dataset is collected in this study, and it is made publicly available to support reproducibility and improve data availability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.587134
Primary Topic
Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection, identification, and localization of faults in PONs using joint OLT and OTDR telemetry data

Pooyan Safari, Sai Kireet Patri, Joseph John, Vishal Chandraprakash et al.
Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
article

Detection, identification, and localization of faults in PONs using joint OLT and OTDR telemetry data

Pooyan Safari, Sai Kireet Patri, Joseph John, Vishal Chandraprakash, Johannes Fischer, Behnam Shariati, Ronald Freund
article en

Abstract

Passive optical networks (PONs) are a key technology for broadband delivery to residential, enterprise, and industrial internet users. Their increasing deployment in latency-sensitive environments such as manufacturing and data centers raises the importance of fast and reliable fault management. Fiber faults—whether at the telecom operator side like tapping and cutting or on the customer’s side like powered-off or unplugged optical network units (ONUs)—can disrupt service, compromise security, and violate service level agreements (SLAs). Conventional optical time domain reflectometry (OTDR) suffers from limited trace interpretability in high-split PONs, while artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches face challenges of scalability, reproducibility, and explainability. First, we propose a heuristic algorithm that combines optical line terminal (OLT) monitoring data with OTDR traces to detect and localize faults in PONs without requiring expensive reflectors installed at the ONU or lengthy AI training and explainability issues. Then, we benchmark its classification capabilities against multiple state-of-the-art AI algorithms like convolutional neural networks (CNNs), feed forward neural networks (FFNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM), bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), bidirectional gated recurrent units (BiGRUs), and two different gradient boosting models. To conclude the paper, we compare our heuristic algorithm with all the others and highlight the trade-offs in accuracy, scalability, and deployment readiness. The algorithms are validated experimentally, demonstrating identification accuracy up to 90% for both deliberate and non-deliberate faults and localization error with median values below one meter. An experimental dataset is collected in this study, and it is made publicly available to support reproducibility and improve data availability.

Journal of Optical Communications and NetworkingVol. 18(9)
Schiller International University (FR), Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.