Taiwan's contested statehood

This article seeks to understand, from an analytical point of view, the various facets of statehood that underpin the case of Taiwan on the international stage. It shows how Taiwan's unrecognized statehood is rooted in the specificity of China's territorial partition and examines logics of exclusion and inclusion in a historical perspective. The exclusion of Taiwan, both at the multilateral and bilateral levels, in the 1970s has been followed by its inclusion, albeit only at the bilateral level, with the reforming of state-to-state relations, yet without state recognition. These logics are consistent with two different approaches to the concept of the state. On the one hand, a legal approach fetishizing the state explains Taiwan's exclusion at the multilateral level. On the other hand, at the bilateral level, concrete practices through which states enter into relations suggest turning to a sociological approach to the state, to the paradigm of the legal-rational legitimacy, and to refine the division between the official and the unofficial. Finally, the article shows that far from being mutually exclusive, logics of exclusion and inclusion stand along a continuum that maintains Taiwan as a long-lasting exception on the international stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Information
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203x261427054
Primary Topic
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taiwan's contested statehood

Françoise Mengin
China Information
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
article

Taiwan's contested statehood

Françoise Mengin
article en

Abstract

This article seeks to understand, from an analytical point of view, the various facets of statehood that underpin the case of Taiwan on the international stage. It shows how Taiwan's unrecognized statehood is rooted in the specificity of China's territorial partition and examines logics of exclusion and inclusion in a historical perspective. The exclusion of Taiwan, both at the multilateral and bilateral levels, in the 1970s has been followed by its inclusion, albeit only at the bilateral level, with the reforming of state-to-state relations, yet without state recognition. These logics are consistent with two different approaches to the concept of the state. On the one hand, a legal approach fetishizing the state explains Taiwan's exclusion at the multilateral level. On the other hand, at the bilateral level, concrete practices through which states enter into relations suggest turning to a sociological approach to the state, to the paradigm of the legal-rational legitimacy, and to refine the division between the official and the unofficial. Finally, the article shows that far from being mutually exclusive, logics of exclusion and inclusion stand along a continuum that maintains Taiwan as a long-lasting exception on the international stage.

China Information
Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR)
Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Taiwan's contested statehood — Françoise Mengin · China Information (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS