Expert panel perspectives on management of GERD post esophageal POEM: a national survey study

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a major issue in the management of patients with achalasia after esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (E-POEM). This study investigated practice patterns surrounding empiric acid suppression, medication de-escalation, pH testing, and follow-up endoscopy of expert gastroenterologists managing these patients. An online 17-item survey study was conducted in November 2024 with a response rate of 30/60. Expertise was determined by prior E-POEM publications and participation in the Delphi consensus on this topic and was validated by reported years of E-POEM experience and average number of E-POEMs performed annually. 90% of responders performed E-POEM and 10% solely managed patients afterwards. 72% practiced in an academic institution and 45% performed more than 50 E-POEMs annually. There was no consensus on dose of acid suppression, but the most common regimen was a 40 mg omeprazole equivalent daily until follow-up. Responders had varied approaches to de-escalation, with 44% consistently performing pH testing. 48% performed endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus/cancer, and 83% of these continued at a regular interval indefinitely. 65% of responders reported taking procedural steps to minimize GERD after E-POEM, most often short myotomy (76%), and 24% a “tailored” approach using EndoFLIP. The majority of experts reported taking measures during E-POEM to limit the risk of GERD. Despite GERD being an important consideration, experts remained almost evenly divided on the role of reflux testing in medication de-escalation and on the practice of endoscopic screening. Prospective studies informed by these expert insights would be especially valuable in determining whether pH testing and endoscopic screening for GERD complications improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-12747-z
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert panel perspectives on management of GERD post esophageal POEM: a national survey study

Kartik Sampath, SriHari Mahadev, Gaurav Ghosh, Reem Z. Sharaiha et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Expert panel perspectives on management of GERD post esophageal POEM: a national survey study

Kartik Sampath, SriHari Mahadev, Gaurav Ghosh, Reem Z. Sharaiha, Dennis J. Yang, B. Joseph Elmunzer, Eliza Cricco-Lizza
article en

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a major issue in the management of patients with achalasia after esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (E-POEM). This study investigated practice patterns surrounding empiric acid suppression, medication de-escalation, pH testing, and follow-up endoscopy of expert gastroenterologists managing these patients. An online 17-item survey study was conducted in November 2024 with a response rate of 30/60. Expertise was determined by prior E-POEM publications and participation in the Delphi consensus on this topic and was validated by reported years of E-POEM experience and average number of E-POEMs performed annually. 90% of responders performed E-POEM and 10% solely managed patients afterwards. 72% practiced in an academic institution and 45% performed more than 50 E-POEMs annually. There was no consensus on dose of acid suppression, but the most common regimen was a 40 mg omeprazole equivalent daily until follow-up. Responders had varied approaches to de-escalation, with 44% consistently performing pH testing. 48% performed endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus/cancer, and 83% of these continued at a regular interval indefinitely. 65% of responders reported taking procedural steps to minimize GERD after E-POEM, most often short myotomy (76%), and 24% a “tailored” approach using EndoFLIP. The majority of experts reported taking measures during E-POEM to limit the risk of GERD. Despite GERD being an important consideration, experts remained almost evenly divided on the role of reflux testing in medication de-escalation and on the practice of endoscopic screening. Prospective studies informed by these expert insights would be especially valuable in determining whether pH testing and endoscopic screening for GERD complications improve patient outcomes.

Surgical Endoscopy
Medical University of South Carolina (US), Cornell University (US), AdventHealth Orlando (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.