Evaluation of FY-3E, CRA, and ERA5 Temperature and Humidity Profiles over North China in Summer

Based on summer ground-based microwave radiometer (MWR) observations over North China, this study systematically evaluates the accuracy of temperature and humidity profile products derived from the Vertical Atmospheric Sounding System (VASS) onboard the FY-3E satellite. The VASS products are compared with the numerical weather prediction (NWP) background fields as well as the ERA5 and CMA-RA 1.5 (CRA) reanalysis datasets. The results show that both ERA5 and CRA exhibit stable and reliable performance in representing temperature and humidity fields under both clear and cloudy conditions over North China. The temperature root mean square error (RMSE) generally ranges from 1.6 K to 2.6 K at different height levels (from 0 km to 10 km), while the RMSE of absolute humidity is approximately 0.4–2.7 g/m3. These results further confirm the reliability of CRA under both clear and cloudy conditions in this region. In contrast, the errors of the VASS products show pronounced variations with height, station, and weather conditions. A clear systematic underestimation of temperature is found at 1–3 km, with a mean bias of about −3.44 K. Humidity is also significantly underestimated in the boundary layer, with a mean bias of approximately −5.91 g/m3. Both temperature and humidity errors decrease rapidly with increasing height. Clear inter-station differences are also identified. Temperature errors show boundary-layer overestimation in Beijing, while Xingtai and Dingzhou exhibit systematic underestimation throughout most of the profile, with mean biases reaching −4.1 K and −3.3 K, respectively. Boundary-layer humidity underestimation is more pronounced in Xingtai and Dingzhou (approximately −6.6 g/m3) than in Beijing (−4.0 g/m3). Weather-based analysis indicates that clouds have a significant impact on the accuracy of the VASS products. Under cloudy conditions, the near-surface temperature mean bias shifts from overestimation under clear skies to underestimation. The magnitude of humidity underestimation under cloudy conditions is approximately twice that under clear conditions. Further comparison shows that the error characteristics of the NWP background fields in the lower and middle troposphere are partly similar to those of the VASS products. This suggests that the current retrieval algorithm still has limited capability to correct background field biases under complex weather conditions. These results provide scientific support for the selection of application scenarios and the optimization of retrieval algorithms for FY-3E/VASS temperature and humidity profile products, and they also support the reliable use of domestic reanalysis datasets in regional studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18071058
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of FY-3E, CRA, and ERA5 Temperature and Humidity Profiles over North China in Summer

Yiwen Cao, Xinbing Ren, Yongjing Ma, Jinyuan Xin et al.
Remote Sensing
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
article

Evaluation of FY-3E, CRA, and ERA5 Temperature and Humidity Profiles over North China in Summer

Yiwen Cao, Xinbing Ren, Yongjing Ma, Jinyuan Xin, Ruixia Liu, Yang Yang, Xin Lv, Yong Hu
article en

Abstract

Based on summer ground-based microwave radiometer (MWR) observations over North China, this study systematically evaluates the accuracy of temperature and humidity profile products derived from the Vertical Atmospheric Sounding System (VASS) onboard the FY-3E satellite. The VASS products are compared with the numerical weather prediction (NWP) background fields as well as the ERA5 and CMA-RA 1.5 (CRA) reanalysis datasets. The results show that both ERA5 and CRA exhibit stable and reliable performance in representing temperature and humidity fields under both clear and cloudy conditions over North China. The temperature root mean square error (RMSE) generally ranges from 1.6 K to 2.6 K at different height levels (from 0 km to 10 km), while the RMSE of absolute humidity is approximately 0.4–2.7 g/m3. These results further confirm the reliability of CRA under both clear and cloudy conditions in this region. In contrast, the errors of the VASS products show pronounced variations with height, station, and weather conditions. A clear systematic underestimation of temperature is found at 1–3 km, with a mean bias of about −3.44 K. Humidity is also significantly underestimated in the boundary layer, with a mean bias of approximately −5.91 g/m3. Both temperature and humidity errors decrease rapidly with increasing height. Clear inter-station differences are also identified. Temperature errors show boundary-layer overestimation in Beijing, while Xingtai and Dingzhou exhibit systematic underestimation throughout most of the profile, with mean biases reaching −4.1 K and −3.3 K, respectively. Boundary-layer humidity underestimation is more pronounced in Xingtai and Dingzhou (approximately −6.6 g/m3) than in Beijing (−4.0 g/m3). Weather-based analysis indicates that clouds have a significant impact on the accuracy of the VASS products. Under cloudy conditions, the near-surface temperature mean bias shifts from overestimation under clear skies to underestimation. The magnitude of humidity underestimation under cloudy conditions is approximately twice that under clear conditions. Further comparison shows that the error characteristics of the NWP background fields in the lower and middle troposphere are partly similar to those of the VASS products. This suggests that the current retrieval algorithm still has limited capability to correct background field biases under complex weather conditions. These results provide scientific support for the selection of application scenarios and the optimization of retrieval algorithms for FY-3E/VASS temperature and humidity profile products, and they also support the reliable use of domestic reanalysis datasets in regional studies.

Remote SensingVol. 18(7)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN), Hebei Meteorological Bureau (CN), Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CN), Jilin Weather Modification Office (CN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.