PsychoPharm aggregated risk score (PARS): a multidimensional tool to flag high-risk pharmacotherapy in psychiatric patients

Introduction: Psychiatric outpatients frequently receive complex, long-term regimens where polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions (DDIs), QT interval risk, anticholinergic load, and serotonergic exposure co-occur. Clinicians must triage drug lists quickly, yet most tools address a single risk domain. We developed the PsychoPharm Aggregated Risk Score (PARS), a visit-level composite score that integrates multiple pharmacological risk domains into a single, clinically interpretable signal. Methods: 75th percentile, using only prescribed drugs, age, and sex as features (explicitly excluding the engineered components to prevent leakage), then compared with additional stratifications by age and sex, as well as a 5-fold GroupKFold. A fixed decision threshold of 0.30 was set to favor recall and F1 for the positive class. A drug-only model was also used to identify drugs associated with High-risk visits. Results: The prevalence of high-risk cases was observed in 25.2% of visits. Across validation schemes, the primary 80-20 patient-level split achieved the best accuracy, precision, and F1 at the 0.30 operating point. In the primary 80-20 split stratified by High-risk status, the logistic model achieved an AUC of 0.931 (patient-bootstrap 95% CI 0.875-0.971). Discrimination was similar with additional age and sex stratification (AUC of 0.938) and 5-fold GroupKFold (pooled out-of-fold AUC 0.939), indicating robustness to partitioning. In the drug-only model, positive associations included drugs such as quetiapine, haloperidol, clozapine, and amiodarone. The highest-ranked visits combined central nervous system-heavy regimens and polypharmacy. Conclusion: As an exploratory tool, PARS integrates DDIs, QT risk, anticholinergic cognitive burden, serotonergic exposure, and polypharmacy into a single probability that reliably discriminates High-risk visits and supports screening at a 0.30 operating threshold. Our approach highlights actionable drug combinations and patient profiles for drug review and deprescribing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1782968
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PsychoPharm aggregated risk score (PARS): a multidimensional tool to flag high-risk pharmacotherapy in psychiatric patients

Lucreția Udrescu, Florina-Diana Goldiș, Sabina-Oana Vasii, Sebastian-Mihai Ardelean et al.
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

PsychoPharm aggregated risk score (PARS): a multidimensional tool to flag high-risk pharmacotherapy in psychiatric patients

Lucreția Udrescu, Florina-Diana Goldiș, Sabina-Oana Vasii, Sebastian-Mihai Ardelean, Mihai Udrescu-Milosav
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Psychiatric outpatients frequently receive complex, long-term regimens where polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions (DDIs), QT interval risk, anticholinergic load, and serotonergic exposure co-occur. Clinicians must triage drug lists quickly, yet most tools address a single risk domain. We developed the PsychoPharm Aggregated Risk Score (PARS), a visit-level composite score that integrates multiple pharmacological risk domains into a single, clinically interpretable signal. Methods: 75th percentile, using only prescribed drugs, age, and sex as features (explicitly excluding the engineered components to prevent leakage), then compared with additional stratifications by age and sex, as well as a 5-fold GroupKFold. A fixed decision threshold of 0.30 was set to favor recall and F1 for the positive class. A drug-only model was also used to identify drugs associated with High-risk visits. Results: The prevalence of high-risk cases was observed in 25.2% of visits. Across validation schemes, the primary 80-20 patient-level split achieved the best accuracy, precision, and F1 at the 0.30 operating point. In the primary 80-20 split stratified by High-risk status, the logistic model achieved an AUC of 0.931 (patient-bootstrap 95% CI 0.875-0.971). Discrimination was similar with additional age and sex stratification (AUC of 0.938) and 5-fold GroupKFold (pooled out-of-fold AUC 0.939), indicating robustness to partitioning. In the drug-only model, positive associations included drugs such as quetiapine, haloperidol, clozapine, and amiodarone. The highest-ranked visits combined central nervous system-heavy regimens and polypharmacy. Conclusion: As an exploratory tool, PARS integrates DDIs, QT risk, anticholinergic cognitive burden, serotonergic exposure, and polypharmacy into a single probability that reliably discriminates High-risk visits and supports screening at a 0.30 operating threshold. Our approach highlights actionable drug combinations and patient profiles for drug review and deprescribing.

Frontiers in PharmacologyVol. 17
Polytechnic University of Timişoara (RO), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.