Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Beyond 24 Hours After Onset: A Nationwide Registry-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the real-world status of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke >24 hours after onset. METHODS: From the data set of Japan Stroke Data Bank, a nationwide, multicenter prospective registry of stroke within 7 days of onset, patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular therapy from 2016 through 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to time from onset to hospital arrival: early (<4.5 hours), late (4.5-24 hours), and very late (>24 hours). The primary outcome was a favorable functional status defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 at discharge for patients with a prestroke mRS score of 0 to 2, and return to prestroke mRS score at discharge for patients with a prestroke mRS score of 3 to 5. RESULTS: A total of 5862 patients were included (median age, 78 years; 42.7% women; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 17; 83.8% with prestroke mRS score, 0-2), with 3988 in the early group, 1548 in the late group, and 326 in the very late group. The very late group was younger, had lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and a higher proportion of large artery atherosclerosis. The favorable functional status was achieved in 41.4%, 35.3%, and 45.7% of the early, late, and very late groups, respectively. In multivariable logistic analyses, both the late (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.52-0.69]) and very late (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62-0.83]) groups showed lower odds of achieving a favorable functional status compared with the early group. When stratified by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, achievement of the favorable functional status was less frequent in the late and very late groups, in that order, compared with the early group, particularly when the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score exceeded ≈10. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide registry, patients undergoing endovascular therapy >24 hours showed distinct clinical profiles, with crude outcomes comparable to patients treated in earlier time windows. These findings provide important context for the design and validation of randomized trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.125.002024
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Beyond 24 Hours After Onset: A Nationwide Registry-Based Analysis

Takako Torii-Yoshimura, Ryoma Inui, Fusao Ikawa, Junji Miyazaki et al.
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Beyond 24 Hours After Onset: A Nationwide Registry-Based Analysis

Takako Torii-Yoshimura, Ryoma Inui, Fusao Ikawa, Junji Miyazaki, Akiko Ishigami, Yoshiki Yagita, Jin Nakahara, Toshio Machida, Shigeru Nogawa, Tomohide Yoshie, Koji Iihara, Toshiichi Watanabe, Takashi Tsuzuki, Shinichi Wada, Kenichi Morita, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Yuko Shimogaki, Kaori Miwa, Shigeru Fujimoto, Ryo Itabashi, Sohei Yoshimura, Kazuo Minematsu, Shotai Kobayashi, Masatoshi Koga, Masahiro Kamouchi, Kanta Tanaka, Kazunori Toyoda
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the real-world status of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke >24 hours after onset. METHODS: From the data set of Japan Stroke Data Bank, a nationwide, multicenter prospective registry of stroke within 7 days of onset, patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular therapy from 2016 through 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to time from onset to hospital arrival: early (<4.5 hours), late (4.5-24 hours), and very late (>24 hours). The primary outcome was a favorable functional status defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 at discharge for patients with a prestroke mRS score of 0 to 2, and return to prestroke mRS score at discharge for patients with a prestroke mRS score of 3 to 5. RESULTS: A total of 5862 patients were included (median age, 78 years; 42.7% women; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 17; 83.8% with prestroke mRS score, 0-2), with 3988 in the early group, 1548 in the late group, and 326 in the very late group. The very late group was younger, had lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and a higher proportion of large artery atherosclerosis. The favorable functional status was achieved in 41.4%, 35.3%, and 45.7% of the early, late, and very late groups, respectively. In multivariable logistic analyses, both the late (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.52-0.69]) and very late (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62-0.83]) groups showed lower odds of achieving a favorable functional status compared with the early group. When stratified by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, achievement of the favorable functional status was less frequent in the late and very late groups, in that order, compared with the early group, particularly when the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score exceeded ≈10. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide registry, patients undergoing endovascular therapy >24 hours showed distinct clinical profiles, with crude outcomes comparable to patients treated in earlier time windows. These findings provide important context for the design and validation of randomized trials.

Stroke Vascular and Interventional NeurologyVol. 6(3)
Keio University (JP), Department of Public Health (AS), Sakai Municipal Hospital (JP), Niigata City General Hospital (JP), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP), Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center (JP), Osaka International University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.