Feasibility of Implementing a Clinical Integration Package to Support Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: Despite strong evidence, self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) remains underutilized in under-resourced primary care settings. We evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementing a multicomponent SMBP delivery package in a diverse community clinic. METHODS: We examined barriers and facilitators to implementing the ASPIRE (Adapting Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring among Underserved Communities) package, designed to support SMBP adoption in primary care. After an ASPIRE pilot conducted at a Chicago South Side clinic serving a racially diverse population with high social needs, we conducted semistructured interviews with patients and care team members. ASPIRE components consisted of the provision of a free SMBP device, training, a paper tracking log, reminders, resources to address social needs, and documentation workflows. Eligible patients had a hypertension diagnosis, were prescribed 1 or more blood pressure medications, and had elevated blood pressure (blood pressure ≥) between January and May 2024. All 25 patients randomized to the intervention arm were invited to participate. Care team members engaged with the pilot were also invited to participate (n=40). Interviews explored domains impacting implementation, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 20 patients and 11 care team members (2 attending physicians, 7 residents, and 2 medical assistants). Among patients, 18 (90%) were over the age of 50, 17 (85%) identified as Black, and the median systolic blood pressure at baseline was 142.0 mm Hg (interquartile range, 137.0-153.0). Key facilitators of ASPIRE implementation included in-person SMBP training, which enhanced patient self-efficacy and positive beliefs about SMBP, and reminders and ongoing support, which were viewed as strengths in intervention design. Barriers emerged related to social needs screening processes and self-monitoring log usability, highlighting challenges in execution, planning, and resource alignment. CONCLUSIONS: ASPIRE shows promise for supporting SMBP adoption in under-resourced primary care settings and actionable insights for refining implementation strategies. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06175793.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Population Health and Outcomes
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.125.012252
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of Implementing a Clinical Integration Package to Support Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study

Iridian Guzman, Melanie Gordon, Julie C. Lauffenburger, Maureen Shields et al.
Circulation Population Health and Outcomes
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Feasibility of Implementing a Clinical Integration Package to Support Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study

Iridian Guzman, Melanie Gordon, Julie C. Lauffenburger, Maureen Shields, Nicole Glowacki, Rasha Khatib, Nallely Mora, Kathryn M. Ross, Osondi Ozoani
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite strong evidence, self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) remains underutilized in under-resourced primary care settings. We evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementing a multicomponent SMBP delivery package in a diverse community clinic. METHODS: We examined barriers and facilitators to implementing the ASPIRE (Adapting Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring among Underserved Communities) package, designed to support SMBP adoption in primary care. After an ASPIRE pilot conducted at a Chicago South Side clinic serving a racially diverse population with high social needs, we conducted semistructured interviews with patients and care team members. ASPIRE components consisted of the provision of a free SMBP device, training, a paper tracking log, reminders, resources to address social needs, and documentation workflows. Eligible patients had a hypertension diagnosis, were prescribed 1 or more blood pressure medications, and had elevated blood pressure (blood pressure ≥) between January and May 2024. All 25 patients randomized to the intervention arm were invited to participate. Care team members engaged with the pilot were also invited to participate (n=40). Interviews explored domains impacting implementation, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 20 patients and 11 care team members (2 attending physicians, 7 residents, and 2 medical assistants). Among patients, 18 (90%) were over the age of 50, 17 (85%) identified as Black, and the median systolic blood pressure at baseline was 142.0 mm Hg (interquartile range, 137.0-153.0). Key facilitators of ASPIRE implementation included in-person SMBP training, which enhanced patient self-efficacy and positive beliefs about SMBP, and reminders and ongoing support, which were viewed as strengths in intervention design. Barriers emerged related to social needs screening processes and self-monitoring log usability, highlighting challenges in execution, planning, and resource alignment. CONCLUSIONS: ASPIRE shows promise for supporting SMBP adoption in under-resourced primary care settings and actionable insights for refining implementation strategies. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06175793.

Circulation Population Health and Outcomes
Aurora Health Care (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Chicago Department of Public Health (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), Advocate Christ Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.