Weaving threads of knowledge: Reflecting transdisciplinary approaches and co-production in local climate change adaptation research

Despite the growing prominence of knowledge co-production in transdisciplinary adaptation research, there is still limited understanding of how different co-production approaches shape transdisciplinary work and its knowledge outcomes. This paper addresses this gap through an ex-post reflexive analysis of a transdisciplinary project on local climate change adaptation (2020–2023) in southwest Germany, conducted by an interdisciplinary team in collaboration with six public administrations (three municipalities and three districts). Drawing on qualitative data such as project documents, interviews, and focus groups, we compare two co-production modes within this project: a normative-procedural (output-oriented) mode oriented to serviceable adaptation knowledge, and a philosophical-analytical (process-oriented) mode oriented to understanding adaptation process within administrations in small municipalities and districts. Across both modes, we examine how positionalities and power relations shaped what could be articulated, prioritised, and institutionalised in transdisciplinary collaboration. We show that output-oriented co-production can generate highly relevant boundary objects that support local adaptation, but it may also stabilise interpretive authority, narrow problem framings, and sideline contestation. Process-oriented co-production, by contrast, enabled deeper inquiry into constraints and enabling conditions within administrations, beyond what an output-driven mode would typically surface, while it brought recurring challenges around roles, ownership of problem framings, and the handling of uncertainty when producing knowledge expected to be actionable. We argue that the key question is not whether co-production “works”, but what it forecloses: different co-production modes influence epistemic authority and closure, highlighting the need to make these trade-offs explicit when designing transdisciplinary adaptation projects with local governments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104370
Primary Topic
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weaving threads of knowledge: Reflecting transdisciplinary approaches and co-production in local climate change adaptation research

Hartmut Fünfgeld, Dennis Fila, Nils Riach, Rüdiger Glaser
Environmental Science & Policy
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
article

Weaving threads of knowledge: Reflecting transdisciplinary approaches and co-production in local climate change adaptation research

Hartmut Fünfgeld, Dennis Fila, Nils Riach, Rüdiger Glaser
article en

Abstract

Despite the growing prominence of knowledge co-production in transdisciplinary adaptation research, there is still limited understanding of how different co-production approaches shape transdisciplinary work and its knowledge outcomes. This paper addresses this gap through an ex-post reflexive analysis of a transdisciplinary project on local climate change adaptation (2020–2023) in southwest Germany, conducted by an interdisciplinary team in collaboration with six public administrations (three municipalities and three districts). Drawing on qualitative data such as project documents, interviews, and focus groups, we compare two co-production modes within this project: a normative-procedural (output-oriented) mode oriented to serviceable adaptation knowledge, and a philosophical-analytical (process-oriented) mode oriented to understanding adaptation process within administrations in small municipalities and districts. Across both modes, we examine how positionalities and power relations shaped what could be articulated, prioritised, and institutionalised in transdisciplinary collaboration. We show that output-oriented co-production can generate highly relevant boundary objects that support local adaptation, but it may also stabilise interpretive authority, narrow problem framings, and sideline contestation. Process-oriented co-production, by contrast, enabled deeper inquiry into constraints and enabling conditions within administrations, beyond what an output-driven mode would typically surface, while it brought recurring challenges around roles, ownership of problem framings, and the handling of uncertainty when producing knowledge expected to be actionable. We argue that the key question is not whether co-production “works”, but what it forecloses: different co-production modes influence epistemic authority and closure, highlighting the need to make these trade-offs explicit when designing transdisciplinary adaptation projects with local governments.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 179
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.