Clinical tissue response to different concentrations of chlorhexidine applied to hybrid and chitosan-based dermal fillers: An in vivo study

Objective: The study investigated how different chlorhexidine concentrations affect tissue reactions in living animals through an in vivo animal study. Methods: Twelve healthy adult New Zealand white rabbits were allocated into two groups according to filler type: hybrid filler and chitosan-based filler (n = 6 each). The researchers performed subcutaneous injections of dermal fillers and applied chlorhexidine solution at three different strengths of 0.2% and 2.0% and 2.2% to different injection areas. The semi-quantitative inflammation scoring system allowed researchers to evaluate local tissue reactions at three different time points (7, 12 and 20 days post-application). The researchers used appropriate statistical methods to determine which chlorhexidine concentrations and filler materials influenced tissue tolerance. Results: The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution caused brief and slight inflammatory reactions, which occurred in both hybrid and chitosan-based filler materials. The tissue showed increased inflammation at higher concentration levels of 2.0% and 2.2%, which resulted in prolonged skin redness and swelling. The chitosan-based fillers produced higher inflammation scores than hybrid fillers during tests which used identical chlorhexidine concentrations (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The study findings demonstrate that tissue tolerance depends on two main elements, which are chlorhexidine concentration and filler material composition. The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution demonstrates potential for medical applications with hybrid and chitosan-based dermal fillers, but it causes inflammatory responses when used at elevated concentrations, which damages chitosan-based materials. The study results show that dermal filler procedures require individualised antiseptic protocols to achieve the best possible tissue protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Babcock University Medical Journal
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38029/babcockuniv.med.j..v9i1.1343
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical tissue response to different concentrations of chlorhexidine applied to hybrid and chitosan-based dermal fillers: An in vivo study

Basma J. Ahmed, Mughis Uddin Ahmed, Yaqoob Abdalkarem, Asmaa Thanoon et al.
Babcock University Medical Journal
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
article

Clinical tissue response to different concentrations of chlorhexidine applied to hybrid and chitosan-based dermal fillers: An in vivo study

Basma J. Ahmed, Mughis Uddin Ahmed, Yaqoob Abdalkarem, Asmaa Thanoon, Tamarah Mazin
article en

Abstract

Objective: The study investigated how different chlorhexidine concentrations affect tissue reactions in living animals through an in vivo animal study. Methods: Twelve healthy adult New Zealand white rabbits were allocated into two groups according to filler type: hybrid filler and chitosan-based filler (n = 6 each). The researchers performed subcutaneous injections of dermal fillers and applied chlorhexidine solution at three different strengths of 0.2% and 2.0% and 2.2% to different injection areas. The semi-quantitative inflammation scoring system allowed researchers to evaluate local tissue reactions at three different time points (7, 12 and 20 days post-application). The researchers used appropriate statistical methods to determine which chlorhexidine concentrations and filler materials influenced tissue tolerance. Results: The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution caused brief and slight inflammatory reactions, which occurred in both hybrid and chitosan-based filler materials. The tissue showed increased inflammation at higher concentration levels of 2.0% and 2.2%, which resulted in prolonged skin redness and swelling. The chitosan-based fillers produced higher inflammation scores than hybrid fillers during tests which used identical chlorhexidine concentrations (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The study findings demonstrate that tissue tolerance depends on two main elements, which are chlorhexidine concentration and filler material composition. The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution demonstrates potential for medical applications with hybrid and chitosan-based dermal fillers, but it causes inflammatory responses when used at elevated concentrations, which damages chitosan-based materials. The study results show that dermal filler procedures require individualised antiseptic protocols to achieve the best possible tissue protection.

Babcock University Medical JournalVol. 9(1)
University of Mosul (IQ), Al Noor Hospitals (AE), University of Baghdad (IQ), Directorate of Health (IS), Bayan College (OM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.