Validity of military service as reported on U.S. death certificates

BACKGROUND: Although death certificates are widely used to study mortality in the general population, their use to study mortality among individuals with military service has been limited in part by a lack of information on the validity of military service reported on death certificates. Our objective was to estimate bias parameters for misclassification of military service to facilitate quantitative bias analysis in studies of mortality in military populations. METHODS: We included 2014-2021 death certificates from decedents aged 18-64 years who resided and died in Alabama, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, or Oregon. Death certificates were linked to military service records by the U.S. Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) using Social Security Number. Military service was defined as any service in the Regular, Reserve, or National Guard components of the U.S. military in DMDC records. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for military service reported on death certificates stratified by demographics, military characteristics, and manner of death. RESULTS: Among the 467,075 death certificates included, 9.3% indicated military service; however, military records showed that 10.9% had served (sensitivity 81.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 81.2-81.8%; specificity 99.5%, 95% CI: 99.5-99.5%). Sensitivity was lower among female (72.3%) compared to male (82.2%) servicemembers and was particularly low for those who had never served on active duty (63.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Military service was underreported on death certificates, especially for female servicemembers and those without active-duty service. The bias parameters we estimated can be used to account for this misclassification when analyzing death certificates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001983
Primary Topic
Census and Population Estimation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of military service as reported on U.S. death certificates

Elliot D. Hill, Devdutta Sangvai, Heather Batchelder, Lucy Akushevich et al.
Epidemiology
Census and Population Estimation
article

Validity of military service as reported on U.S. death certificates

Elliot D. Hill, Devdutta Sangvai, Heather Batchelder, Lucy Akushevich, Katelyn M. Holliday, Laura J. Fish, Candice Y. Johnson, Ashley E. Price, Truls Østbye
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although death certificates are widely used to study mortality in the general population, their use to study mortality among individuals with military service has been limited in part by a lack of information on the validity of military service reported on death certificates. Our objective was to estimate bias parameters for misclassification of military service to facilitate quantitative bias analysis in studies of mortality in military populations. METHODS: We included 2014-2021 death certificates from decedents aged 18-64 years who resided and died in Alabama, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, or Oregon. Death certificates were linked to military service records by the U.S. Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) using Social Security Number. Military service was defined as any service in the Regular, Reserve, or National Guard components of the U.S. military in DMDC records. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for military service reported on death certificates stratified by demographics, military characteristics, and manner of death. RESULTS: Among the 467,075 death certificates included, 9.3% indicated military service; however, military records showed that 10.9% had served (sensitivity 81.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 81.2-81.8%; specificity 99.5%, 95% CI: 99.5-99.5%). Sensitivity was lower among female (72.3%) compared to male (82.2%) servicemembers and was particularly low for those who had never served on active duty (63.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Military service was underreported on death certificates, especially for female servicemembers and those without active-duty service. The bias parameters we estimated can be used to account for this misclassification when analyzing death certificates.

Epidemiology
Duke University Health System (US), Michigan State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Census and Population Estimation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.