Exploring the Relationship Between Alarm Fatigue and Compassion Fatigue Among Critical Care Nurses

BACKGROUND: Alarm fatigue, characterized by desensitization resulting from excessive clinical alarms, can compromise patient safety. Compassion fatigue, defined as the emotional toll of caring for patients in distress, is a recognized occupational hazard among nurses. Both alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue are significant stressors that negatively affect nurses' professional well-being and the quality of patient care. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue among critical care nurses including those working in intensive care units (ICUs) and the emergency department (ED). STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional research design was employed to assess the levels of alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue and to examine whether a significant relationship exists between these two phenomena. The study was conducted between June and October 2024 with the nurses working in ICUs and ED of a hospital in Türkiye. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire, and the Compassion Fatigue Scale. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, number, percentage), the One-way ANOVA, Independent T-test and Ki-kare tests, and Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS: A total of 209 nurses participated in the study. Nurses reported moderate levels of alarm fatigue (mean AFQ = 19.84 ± 6.49) and compassion fatigue (mean CFS = 80.71 ± 14.94), with 30.6% meeting the threshold for high compassion fatigue. Correlation and regression analyses indicated a weak, non-significant negative association between alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue (r = -0.120, p = 0.083). No significant differences were found in alarm or compassion fatigue scores across demographic or work-related factors such as age, gender, education, years of experience, shift type, weekly working hours, hospital bed capacity, or unit type. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care nurses experienced moderate levels of both alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue. The lack of a statistically significant relationship suggests that these phenomena may be influenced by distinct factors rather than being directly interrelated. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Moderate levels of both alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue highlight the need to increase awareness of these occupational challenges. Implementing institutional support, including workload management, training programs and access to psychological support, can help nurses cope with these stressors. Although quality of care was not directly measured, addressing these fatigue types may indirectly support safe and effective patient care in critical care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing in Critical Care
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70441
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Relationship Between Alarm Fatigue and Compassion Fatigue Among Critical Care Nurses

Ülkü Yapucu Güneş, Fadim Nur Ceran
Nursing in Critical Care
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Exploring the Relationship Between Alarm Fatigue and Compassion Fatigue Among Critical Care Nurses

Ülkü Yapucu Güneş, Fadim Nur Ceran
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alarm fatigue, characterized by desensitization resulting from excessive clinical alarms, can compromise patient safety. Compassion fatigue, defined as the emotional toll of caring for patients in distress, is a recognized occupational hazard among nurses. Both alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue are significant stressors that negatively affect nurses' professional well-being and the quality of patient care. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue among critical care nurses including those working in intensive care units (ICUs) and the emergency department (ED). STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional research design was employed to assess the levels of alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue and to examine whether a significant relationship exists between these two phenomena. The study was conducted between June and October 2024 with the nurses working in ICUs and ED of a hospital in Türkiye. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire, and the Compassion Fatigue Scale. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, number, percentage), the One-way ANOVA, Independent T-test and Ki-kare tests, and Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS: A total of 209 nurses participated in the study. Nurses reported moderate levels of alarm fatigue (mean AFQ = 19.84 ± 6.49) and compassion fatigue (mean CFS = 80.71 ± 14.94), with 30.6% meeting the threshold for high compassion fatigue. Correlation and regression analyses indicated a weak, non-significant negative association between alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue (r = -0.120, p = 0.083). No significant differences were found in alarm or compassion fatigue scores across demographic or work-related factors such as age, gender, education, years of experience, shift type, weekly working hours, hospital bed capacity, or unit type. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care nurses experienced moderate levels of both alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue. The lack of a statistically significant relationship suggests that these phenomena may be influenced by distinct factors rather than being directly interrelated. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Moderate levels of both alarm fatigue and compassion fatigue highlight the need to increase awareness of these occupational challenges. Implementing institutional support, including workload management, training programs and access to psychological support, can help nurses cope with these stressors. Although quality of care was not directly measured, addressing these fatigue types may indirectly support safe and effective patient care in critical care settings.

Nursing in Critical CareVol. 31(3)
Ege University (TR), Sivas State Hospital (TR), Muğla University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.