Zone Matcher: A climate‐based web application for deployment and assisted migration of forest trees

Abstract Populations of forest trees are generally adapted to the climates they inhabit. The farther trees are moved from their local climates, the more long‐term growth and survival tend to decrease. Current tree deployment and assisted migration rely on “climate distance thresholds” (CDTs), which are climatic distances beyond which tree performance is considered unacceptable. Fixed zone systems, which have been used to guide deployment of native or orchard seedlots for more than 50 years, usually consist of contiguous geographic areas (zone units) divided into elevational bands (zones). In contrast, focal zone systems allow seed transfer among fixed zones that have similar climates. By using recent historical climates and future climate projections, focal zones can be used for current tree deployment or assisted migration. We developed a focal‐zone system for the Pacific Northwest region of North America. First, we worked with stakeholders to select the base zones for the system. These consisted of geographic zone sets from Washington, Oregon, California, and Idaho/western Montana, and ecological zone sets from the United States and British Columbia. Second, by analyzing climate variation across the region, we developed a normalized Euclidean climate distance function consisting of nine climate variables from ClimateNA. Third, we inferred CDTs from analyses of climate variation within the base zones and from provenance tests. Fourth, we compared seed deployment areas using the fixed zone versus focal zone system, with and without assisted migration. Finally, we developed the Zone Matcher web application which implements our focal zone system. Across the region, we identified climate matches among 4393 partially overlapping zones covering approximately 252 Mha. The unique area covered by these zones was about 167 Mha. Compared to fixed zones, our focal zone system increased the deployment area by about 19‐ to 39‐fold for the ecological zones and 72‐ to 342‐fold for the geographic zones. This expands seed deployment options, allows more seedlots to be considered for a planting site, facilitates assisted migration, and simplifies sharing of seedlots among organizations. In addition to climate, seed transfer should also consider factors such as plantation soils, microtopography, and projections of competing vegetation, insects, diseases, and fire.

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosphere
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70570
Primary Topic
Seedling growth and survival studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zone Matcher: A climate‐based web application for deployment and assisted migration of forest trees

Ecosphere
Seedling growth and survival studies
article

Zone Matcher: A climate‐based web application for deployment and assisted migration of forest trees

article en

Abstract

Abstract Populations of forest trees are generally adapted to the climates they inhabit. The farther trees are moved from their local climates, the more long‐term growth and survival tend to decrease. Current tree deployment and assisted migration rely on “climate distance thresholds” (CDTs), which are climatic distances beyond which tree performance is considered unacceptable. Fixed zone systems, which have been used to guide deployment of native or orchard seedlots for more than 50 years, usually consist of contiguous geographic areas (zone units) divided into elevational bands (zones). In contrast, focal zone systems allow seed transfer among fixed zones that have similar climates. By using recent historical climates and future climate projections, focal zones can be used for current tree deployment or assisted migration. We developed a focal‐zone system for the Pacific Northwest region of North America. First, we worked with stakeholders to select the base zones for the system. These consisted of geographic zone sets from Washington, Oregon, California, and Idaho/western Montana, and ecological zone sets from the United States and British Columbia. Second, by analyzing climate variation across the region, we developed a normalized Euclidean climate distance function consisting of nine climate variables from ClimateNA. Third, we inferred CDTs from analyses of climate variation within the base zones and from provenance tests. Fourth, we compared seed deployment areas using the fixed zone versus focal zone system, with and without assisted migration. Finally, we developed the Zone Matcher web application which implements our focal zone system. Across the region, we identified climate matches among 4393 partially overlapping zones covering approximately 252 Mha. The unique area covered by these zones was about 167 Mha. Compared to fixed zones, our focal zone system increased the deployment area by about 19‐ to 39‐fold for the ecological zones and 72‐ to 342‐fold for the geographic zones. This expands seed deployment options, allows more seedlots to be considered for a planting site, facilitates assisted migration, and simplifies sharing of seedlots among organizations. In addition to climate, seed transfer should also consider factors such as plantation soils, microtopography, and projections of competing vegetation, insects, diseases, and fire.

EcosphereVol. 17(4)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Seedling growth and survival studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Zone Matcher: A climate‐based web application for deployment and assisted migration of forest trees · Ecosphere (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS