Fall risk assessment using the World Guidelines for Falls Prevention Algorithm: Evidence from the ELSI-Brazil study

BACKGROUND: The World Guidelines for Falls Prevention and Management (WGF) propose a global algorithm to stratify fall risk in older adults using fall history (FH) or key questions (KQ). However, evidence on the applicability of this screening tool in low- and middle-income countries, and on whether these approaches produce different population estimates, remains limited. Implementing this tool may enhance the identification of older adults at higher risk of falls. OBJECTIVE: This study estimated national and regional fall risk prevalence in Brazil using both methods and examined geographic differences. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from older participants (≥ 60 years) of the third wave of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil, 2023-2024), a nationally representative study. According to the WGF algorithm, participants were classified as high, intermediate, or low fall risk based on FH or two KQ (concern about falling and postural instability) combined with gait speed ≤ 0.8 m/s and severity markers. KQ included concern about falling, assessed using the short version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International, and postural instability evaluated using the tandem stance test (impaired balance if < 10 s). Poisson regression with robust variance adjusted for sociodemographic factors was used to examine regional differences in fall risk prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 7515 older adults participated in this study (67.8 ± 0.2 years; 57.1% female). Using FH alone, 82.2% of older adults were classified as low risk, 7.8% as intermediate, and 10.0% as high risk. Using KQ, the prevalence was 50.4%, 34.6%, and 15.0%, respectively. With the KQ approach, older adults in the Northeast and Southeast had a lower probability of being low risk and a higher probability of being intermediate risk compared with those in the South. No regional differences were observed for high-risk classification or when FH alone was used. CONCLUSION: Operationalizing the WGF algorithm with KQ substantially increases intermediate fall risk identification compared to FH alone. Based on national population estimates, approximately 3.5 million older Brazilian adults may be at high risk of falls. Within-country regional disparities reinforce the need for tailored strategies to address contextual differences in fall prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Geriatric Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-026-01446-6
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fall risk assessment using the World Guidelines for Falls Prevention Algorithm: Evidence from the ELSI-Brazil study

Amanda Cristina de Souza Andrade, Ana Lúcia Danielewicz, Juleimar Soares Coelho de Amorim, Mônica Rodrigues Perracini et al.
European Geriatric Medicine
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Fall risk assessment using the World Guidelines for Falls Prevention Algorithm: Evidence from the ELSI-Brazil study

Amanda Cristina de Souza Andrade, Ana Lúcia Danielewicz, Juleimar Soares Coelho de Amorim, Mônica Rodrigues Perracini, Bruno Bagatin de Souza Moreira, Juliana Lustosa Torres, Núbia Carelli Pereira de Avelar, Manuel Montero-Odasso, Maria Fernanda Lima-Costa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Guidelines for Falls Prevention and Management (WGF) propose a global algorithm to stratify fall risk in older adults using fall history (FH) or key questions (KQ). However, evidence on the applicability of this screening tool in low- and middle-income countries, and on whether these approaches produce different population estimates, remains limited. Implementing this tool may enhance the identification of older adults at higher risk of falls. OBJECTIVE: This study estimated national and regional fall risk prevalence in Brazil using both methods and examined geographic differences. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from older participants (≥ 60 years) of the third wave of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil, 2023-2024), a nationally representative study. According to the WGF algorithm, participants were classified as high, intermediate, or low fall risk based on FH or two KQ (concern about falling and postural instability) combined with gait speed ≤ 0.8 m/s and severity markers. KQ included concern about falling, assessed using the short version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International, and postural instability evaluated using the tandem stance test (impaired balance if < 10 s). Poisson regression with robust variance adjusted for sociodemographic factors was used to examine regional differences in fall risk prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 7515 older adults participated in this study (67.8 ± 0.2 years; 57.1% female). Using FH alone, 82.2% of older adults were classified as low risk, 7.8% as intermediate, and 10.0% as high risk. Using KQ, the prevalence was 50.4%, 34.6%, and 15.0%, respectively. With the KQ approach, older adults in the Northeast and Southeast had a lower probability of being low risk and a higher probability of being intermediate risk compared with those in the South. No regional differences were observed for high-risk classification or when FH alone was used. CONCLUSION: Operationalizing the WGF algorithm with KQ substantially increases intermediate fall risk identification compared to FH alone. Based on national population estimates, approximately 3.5 million older Brazilian adults may be at high risk of falls. Within-country regional disparities reinforce the need for tailored strategies to address contextual differences in fall prevention.

European Geriatric Medicine
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Western University (CA), Lawson Health Research Institute (CA), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (BR), Parkwood Institute (CA)
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.