The safety and effectiveness of anesthetic drops for intravitreal drug administration: a meta-analysis

Background: Intravitreal injections (IVI) are increasingly performed for the management of retinal diseases, yet procedural discomfort remains a common concern. Topical anesthetic drops are frequently used to mitigate pain, but evidence regarding their safety and efficacy compared with alternative anesthetic modalities, such as gels or subconjunctival injections, remains heterogeneous and limited. Objective: To systematically evaluate the safety and effectiveness of topical anesthetic drops for intravitreal drug administration, with a focus on patient-reported pain, procedural discomfort, and satisfaction compared with other anesthetic methods. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other databases through October 2025. Eligible studies included clinical studies comparing topical anesthetic drops for IVI with other topical anesthetic agents. Results: = 0.43). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent results across different formulations and delivery methods. Conclusion: Topical anesthetic drops are a safe, effective, and well-tolerated option for IVI, providing analgesia comparable to gels and subconjunctival anesthesia. Their rapid onset and ease of administration support their use as a first-line anesthetic strategy in routine clinical practice, particularly in high-volume injection settings. Further high-quality randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings across diverse patient populations and clinical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1778281
Primary Topic
Ocular Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The safety and effectiveness of anesthetic drops for intravitreal drug administration: a meta-analysis

Amro Alhazimi
Frontiers in Medicine
Ocular Infections and Treatments
article

The safety and effectiveness of anesthetic drops for intravitreal drug administration: a meta-analysis

Amro Alhazimi
article en

Abstract

Background: Intravitreal injections (IVI) are increasingly performed for the management of retinal diseases, yet procedural discomfort remains a common concern. Topical anesthetic drops are frequently used to mitigate pain, but evidence regarding their safety and efficacy compared with alternative anesthetic modalities, such as gels or subconjunctival injections, remains heterogeneous and limited. Objective: To systematically evaluate the safety and effectiveness of topical anesthetic drops for intravitreal drug administration, with a focus on patient-reported pain, procedural discomfort, and satisfaction compared with other anesthetic methods. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other databases through October 2025. Eligible studies included clinical studies comparing topical anesthetic drops for IVI with other topical anesthetic agents. Results: = 0.43). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent results across different formulations and delivery methods. Conclusion: Topical anesthetic drops are a safe, effective, and well-tolerated option for IVI, providing analgesia comparable to gels and subconjunctival anesthesia. Their rapid onset and ease of administration support their use as a first-line anesthetic strategy in routine clinical practice, particularly in high-volume injection settings. Further high-quality randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings across diverse patient populations and clinical contexts.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Islamic University (BD)
Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Ocular Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.