Voting intentions during the later stage of the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of risk perception and performance evaluations in South Korea

In this study, we examine voting intentions during the later stage of the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to risk perceptions and performance evaluations. Although prior research has documented rally-around-the-flag effects during the early phase of the pandemic, less is known about how vote choice is structured once acute crisis conditions have waned. This study draws on a nationally representative survey conducted in South Korea around the March 2022 presidential election. The analysis examines associations between affective and cognitive risk perceptions, evaluations of the government's COVID-19 countermeasures, overall government approval, economic evaluations and expectations, and voting intention. The results show that cognitive risk perception was associated with voting intention to a limited degree, whereas affective risk perception was not. More importantly, voting intentions were associated with conventional performance evaluations-overall government approval and economic evaluations and expectations-alongside pandemic-response approval, rather than being explained solely by the latter. This study addresses the need to better understand electoral behavior during the later phase of a prolonged crisis, a period that has received far less scholarly attention than the acute onset of the pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345621
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voting intentions during the later stage of the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of risk perception and performance evaluations in South Korea

Dong-Hee Joe, Won Mo Jang, Seongoh Park, Deok Hyun Jang et al.
PLoS ONE
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Voting intentions during the later stage of the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of risk perception and performance evaluations in South Korea

Dong-Hee Joe, Won Mo Jang, Seongoh Park, Deok Hyun Jang, Gyeongmin Kim, Soo young Kim, Cheonsoo Kim
article en

Abstract

In this study, we examine voting intentions during the later stage of the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to risk perceptions and performance evaluations. Although prior research has documented rally-around-the-flag effects during the early phase of the pandemic, less is known about how vote choice is structured once acute crisis conditions have waned. This study draws on a nationally representative survey conducted in South Korea around the March 2022 presidential election. The analysis examines associations between affective and cognitive risk perceptions, evaluations of the government's COVID-19 countermeasures, overall government approval, economic evaluations and expectations, and voting intention. The results show that cognitive risk perception was associated with voting intention to a limited degree, whereas affective risk perception was not. More importantly, voting intentions were associated with conventional performance evaluations-overall government approval and economic evaluations and expectations-alongside pandemic-response approval, rather than being explained solely by the latter. This study addresses the need to better understand electoral behavior during the later phase of a prolonged crisis, a period that has received far less scholarly attention than the acute onset of the pandemic.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
Seoul National University (KR), Sungshin Women's University (KR), Seoul Metropolitan Government (KR), The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US), SNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (KR), Gallup Korea (KR), Jeonbuk National University (KR), Myongji University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.