Standardized Images and Evaluation Metrics for Tomography

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Modern tomographic reconstruction methods-including physics-informed and AI-based approaches-can produce very high fidelity images. In this regime, widely used global image quality metrics often approach saturation, making it harder to distinguish residual differences between methods and identify remaining performance gaps. This study introduces a physically grounded and standardized evaluation framework designed to retain sensitivity beyond conventional global metrics and support both comparison and systematic improvement in tomographic reconstruction methods. METHODS: The proposed framework defines standardized reference images-"Source", "Detector", "Ideal", and "Realistic"-using Monte Carlo simulations, with the Ideal Image serving as a physically grounded benchmark. Reconstruction performance is evaluated using pixel-wise difference and χ2 maps, Region-of-Interest analysis, intensity (gray-value) histogram comparisons, and the Structure and Contrast Index (SCI), computed on difference maps. Demonstrations use simulated SPECT data reconstructed with ART, MLEM, and RISE-1. RESULTS: Across case studies, SCI and χ2-based diagnostics reveal structured residuals and localized deficiencies not evident from global similarity metrics such as SSIM or NMSE. Comparative analyses show that methods with similar global scores can exhibit distinct residual structures and region-specific performance variations, while improved agreement in the sinogram domain does not necessarily translate into improved image fidelity. Histogram-based diagnostics provide complementary information on intensity redistribution not captured by pixel-domain summaries. CONCLUSIONS: The framework provides a reproducible, physically meaningful, and sensitive approach for evaluating tomographic reconstruction performance in the high-fidelity regime. By combining standardized reference images with multi-domain and multi-metric analysis, it enables robust benchmarking and supports physically consistent interpretation of reconstruction quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tomography
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography12040049
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardized Images and Evaluation Metrics for Tomography

Costas N. Papanicolas, Theodoros Leontiou, E. Stiliaris, Anna Frixou
Tomography
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Standardized Images and Evaluation Metrics for Tomography

Costas N. Papanicolas, Theodoros Leontiou, E. Stiliaris, Anna Frixou
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Modern tomographic reconstruction methods-including physics-informed and AI-based approaches-can produce very high fidelity images. In this regime, widely used global image quality metrics often approach saturation, making it harder to distinguish residual differences between methods and identify remaining performance gaps. This study introduces a physically grounded and standardized evaluation framework designed to retain sensitivity beyond conventional global metrics and support both comparison and systematic improvement in tomographic reconstruction methods. METHODS: The proposed framework defines standardized reference images-"Source", "Detector", "Ideal", and "Realistic"-using Monte Carlo simulations, with the Ideal Image serving as a physically grounded benchmark. Reconstruction performance is evaluated using pixel-wise difference and χ2 maps, Region-of-Interest analysis, intensity (gray-value) histogram comparisons, and the Structure and Contrast Index (SCI), computed on difference maps. Demonstrations use simulated SPECT data reconstructed with ART, MLEM, and RISE-1. RESULTS: Across case studies, SCI and χ2-based diagnostics reveal structured residuals and localized deficiencies not evident from global similarity metrics such as SSIM or NMSE. Comparative analyses show that methods with similar global scores can exhibit distinct residual structures and region-specific performance variations, while improved agreement in the sinogram domain does not necessarily translate into improved image fidelity. Histogram-based diagnostics provide complementary information on intensity redistribution not captured by pixel-domain summaries. CONCLUSIONS: The framework provides a reproducible, physically meaningful, and sensitive approach for evaluating tomographic reconstruction performance in the high-fidelity regime. By combining standardized reference images with multi-domain and multi-metric analysis, it enables robust benchmarking and supports physically consistent interpretation of reconstruction quality.

TomographyVol. 12(4)
Cyprus Institute (CY), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), University of Cyprus (CY), Frederick University (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.