Assessment of soil erosion using geospatial techniques and USLE in the Shamli watershed of Shimla district, northwestern Himalaya

Soil erosion poses a major threat to forest ecosystems in the fragile north-western Himalayas, where steep terrain, variable rainfall, and sensitive soils accelerate erosion, resulting in topsoil loss and decreased forest productivity. This study evaluated soil loss across various forest types within a 2,800-hectare watershed in the north-western Himalaya (elevation 1,100–2,400 m). The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), combined with GIS and remote sensing, was used to estimate the spatial pattern of soil erosion. Key parameters, including rainfall erosivity (R), soil erodibility (K), topographic factor (LS), cover management factor (C), and support practice factor (P), were obtained from rainfall data, field observations, satellite images, digital elevation models (DEMs), and relevant literature to estimate annual soil loss. The soil loss in the study area was categorized into six classes: slight (< 5 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), moderate (5–10 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), high (10–20 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), very high (20–40 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), severe (40–80 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), and very severe (> 80 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹). The average soil loss during the three-year study was 12.36, 12.88, and 13.65 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. Among forest types, the moist deodar forest showed the highest soil loss, followed by the ban oak forest and the Himalayan chirpine forest consistently over all three years. The results emphasise the importance of implementing targeted soil conservation strategies in the Shamli watershed. The combined USLE–GIS approach highlights the critical influence of vegetation cover and topography in controlling soil erosion and offers a valuable framework for identifying priority areas for restoration and sustainable watershed management. Assessed soil loss using USLE integrated with GIS and remote sensing in a Himalayan watershed. Quantified spatial variation in erosion across chir pine, oak, and moist deodar forest types. Identified degraded forest patches as erosion hotspots with the highest soil loss rates. Demonstrated the significance of geospatial analysis for erosion risk mapping and conservation planning. Provides baseline data for future research on forest soil erosion in Himalayan watersheds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Soil.
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00201-4
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of soil erosion using geospatial techniques and USLE in the Shamli watershed of Shimla district, northwestern Himalaya

PARMANAND KUMAR, Himani Kanwar, Ghanshyam Agrawal, Ranjeet Kumar
Discover Soil.
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

Assessment of soil erosion using geospatial techniques and USLE in the Shamli watershed of Shimla district, northwestern Himalaya

PARMANAND KUMAR, Himani Kanwar, Ghanshyam Agrawal, Ranjeet Kumar
article en

Abstract

Soil erosion poses a major threat to forest ecosystems in the fragile north-western Himalayas, where steep terrain, variable rainfall, and sensitive soils accelerate erosion, resulting in topsoil loss and decreased forest productivity. This study evaluated soil loss across various forest types within a 2,800-hectare watershed in the north-western Himalaya (elevation 1,100–2,400 m). The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), combined with GIS and remote sensing, was used to estimate the spatial pattern of soil erosion. Key parameters, including rainfall erosivity (R), soil erodibility (K), topographic factor (LS), cover management factor (C), and support practice factor (P), were obtained from rainfall data, field observations, satellite images, digital elevation models (DEMs), and relevant literature to estimate annual soil loss. The soil loss in the study area was categorized into six classes: slight (< 5 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), moderate (5–10 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), high (10–20 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), very high (20–40 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), severe (40–80 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), and very severe (> 80 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹). The average soil loss during the three-year study was 12.36, 12.88, and 13.65 t ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. Among forest types, the moist deodar forest showed the highest soil loss, followed by the ban oak forest and the Himalayan chirpine forest consistently over all three years. The results emphasise the importance of implementing targeted soil conservation strategies in the Shamli watershed. The combined USLE–GIS approach highlights the critical influence of vegetation cover and topography in controlling soil erosion and offers a valuable framework for identifying priority areas for restoration and sustainable watershed management. Assessed soil loss using USLE integrated with GIS and remote sensing in a Himalayan watershed. Quantified spatial variation in erosion across chir pine, oak, and moist deodar forest types. Identified degraded forest patches as erosion hotspots with the highest soil loss rates. Demonstrated the significance of geospatial analysis for erosion risk mapping and conservation planning. Provides baseline data for future research on forest soil erosion in Himalayan watersheds.

Discover Soil.Vol. 3(1)
Forest Research Institute (IN), Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (IN), Forest Survey of India (IN), Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry (IN), Himalayan University (IN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.