Area Deprivation and Social Vulnerability Are Associated with Pediatric Vision Screening Outcomes in the University of California, Irvine EyeMobile Program

BACKGROUND: The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) are nationally validated neighborhood-level measures of socioeconomic disadvantage but remain understudied in pediatric ophthalmology. We examined associations between ADI/SVI and school-based vision screening outcomes, refractive error (RE), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and amblyopia suspect status. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of children aged 3-10 years screened by the UCI EyeMobile program (Orange County, California, United States) from 2021-2024. Among 15,842 children screened, 3,350 underwent comprehensive examination. School addresses were geocoded to ADI/SVI quartiles (Q1-Q4; higher quartiles indicate greater disadvantage). Outcomes included referral, 'fit-for-frames,' RE, amblyopia suspect status, and poor BCVA (>0.2 logMAR). Group differences were assessed using chi-square and Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Multivariable regression evaluated associations with ADI/SVI after adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and RE type and severity. Race × index interactions were evaluated, and stratified analyses were performed when significant. RESULTS: Children in Q4 neighborhoods had higher referral rates and were more likely to require new spectacles despite passing screening. Myopia was less common, whereas astigmatism was more common in Q4. After adjustment, both poor BCVA and amblyopia suspect status increased across quartiles (p-trend < 0.001). Compared with Q1, Q4 was associated with higher odds of poor BCVA (aOR [95% CI]: 1.51 [1.13-2.01] for ADI; 1.61 [1.18-2.20] for SVI) and amblyopia suspect status (1.78 [1.30-2.43]; 1.82 [1.33-2.48]). Significant interactions were observed, with stronger Q4 versus Q1 effects among Hispanic (aOR: 1.87) and Asian (aOR: 1.62) children, but not among Caucasian children. CONCLUSIONS: Children from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods had higher odds of amblyopia suspect status and poor BCVA. These findings support incorporating ADI/SVI in pediatric vision care to identify underserved children proactively, allocate resources equitably, and reduce the risk of permanent visual impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eye
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-026-04394-4
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Area Deprivation and Social Vulnerability Are Associated with Pediatric Vision Screening Outcomes in the University of California, Irvine EyeMobile Program

Kourosh Shahraki, Michael W. Madsen, Cecilia Córdova Vallejos, Donny W. Suh et al.
Eye
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Area Deprivation and Social Vulnerability Are Associated with Pediatric Vision Screening Outcomes in the University of California, Irvine EyeMobile Program

Kourosh Shahraki, Michael W. Madsen, Cecilia Córdova Vallejos, Donny W. Suh, Joseph Bui, Jennifer Espinoza, Annabelle Storch, Kimia Rezaei, Jainam Shah, Diana Torres, Kimberly R. Walker, John D. Hong
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) are nationally validated neighborhood-level measures of socioeconomic disadvantage but remain understudied in pediatric ophthalmology. We examined associations between ADI/SVI and school-based vision screening outcomes, refractive error (RE), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and amblyopia suspect status. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of children aged 3-10 years screened by the UCI EyeMobile program (Orange County, California, United States) from 2021-2024. Among 15,842 children screened, 3,350 underwent comprehensive examination. School addresses were geocoded to ADI/SVI quartiles (Q1-Q4; higher quartiles indicate greater disadvantage). Outcomes included referral, 'fit-for-frames,' RE, amblyopia suspect status, and poor BCVA (>0.2 logMAR). Group differences were assessed using chi-square and Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Multivariable regression evaluated associations with ADI/SVI after adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and RE type and severity. Race × index interactions were evaluated, and stratified analyses were performed when significant. RESULTS: Children in Q4 neighborhoods had higher referral rates and were more likely to require new spectacles despite passing screening. Myopia was less common, whereas astigmatism was more common in Q4. After adjustment, both poor BCVA and amblyopia suspect status increased across quartiles (p-trend < 0.001). Compared with Q1, Q4 was associated with higher odds of poor BCVA (aOR [95% CI]: 1.51 [1.13-2.01] for ADI; 1.61 [1.18-2.20] for SVI) and amblyopia suspect status (1.78 [1.30-2.43]; 1.82 [1.33-2.48]). Significant interactions were observed, with stronger Q4 versus Q1 effects among Hispanic (aOR: 1.87) and Asian (aOR: 1.62) children, but not among Caucasian children. CONCLUSIONS: Children from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods had higher odds of amblyopia suspect status and poor BCVA. These findings support incorporating ADI/SVI in pediatric vision care to identify underserved children proactively, allocate resources equitably, and reduce the risk of permanent visual impairment.

Eye
University of California, Riverside (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), University of California, Irvine (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.