Intersegmental Spinal Range of Motion Estimated Using Movement Analysis and a Clinically Compatible Marker Set

PURPOSE: Evaluation of spinal mobility is essential for clinical assessment of spinal disorders and their treatment. Motion capture systems can offer intersegmental kinematic data for the spine, but results usually depend on marker placement, and the definition of reference frames can still pose a challenge for clinical relevance and data comparison. This pilot study aimed to propose a reduced marker set protocol to estimate thoracic, lumbar, and intervertebral ranges of motion (ROM) during functional trunk movements - flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). METHODS: Fifteen asymptomatic young adults performed standardised trunk tasks, while a twenty-one-marker configuration and motion-capture system were used to capture their 3D spinal motion. Anatomical coordinate systems were constructed for pelvis, thoracic, and lumbar regions. Three models of intervertebral kinematic constraints were compared, implementing different degrees of freedom between intervertebral segments, and different distribution of ROM to individual spinal levels. The agreement among models was assessed, and ROM was compared to literature data. RESULTS: Results showed large differences in ROM between kinematic models, as well as differences with reference data in the literature. Furthermore, differences between models were not consistent across all movements (FE, LB, AR). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for in vivo data to reflect functional, coupled spinal motion. The choice of kinematic model had a large impact on ROM and segmental ROM. Nevertheless, the proposed recduced marker protocol combined with validated kinematic constraints could offer a feasible and anatomically plausible solution for clinical spine mobility assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04122-9
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersegmental Spinal Range of Motion Estimated Using Movement Analysis and a Clinically Compatible Marker Set

Maud Crézé, H Él Ène Pillet, Claudio Vergari, Arina Grankova
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Intersegmental Spinal Range of Motion Estimated Using Movement Analysis and a Clinically Compatible Marker Set

Maud Crézé, H Él Ène Pillet, Claudio Vergari, Arina Grankova
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluation of spinal mobility is essential for clinical assessment of spinal disorders and their treatment. Motion capture systems can offer intersegmental kinematic data for the spine, but results usually depend on marker placement, and the definition of reference frames can still pose a challenge for clinical relevance and data comparison. This pilot study aimed to propose a reduced marker set protocol to estimate thoracic, lumbar, and intervertebral ranges of motion (ROM) during functional trunk movements - flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). METHODS: Fifteen asymptomatic young adults performed standardised trunk tasks, while a twenty-one-marker configuration and motion-capture system were used to capture their 3D spinal motion. Anatomical coordinate systems were constructed for pelvis, thoracic, and lumbar regions. Three models of intervertebral kinematic constraints were compared, implementing different degrees of freedom between intervertebral segments, and different distribution of ROM to individual spinal levels. The agreement among models was assessed, and ROM was compared to literature data. RESULTS: Results showed large differences in ROM between kinematic models, as well as differences with reference data in the literature. Furthermore, differences between models were not consistent across all movements (FE, LB, AR). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for in vivo data to reflect functional, coupled spinal motion. The choice of kinematic model had a large impact on ROM and segmental ROM. Nevertheless, the proposed recduced marker protocol combined with validated kinematic constraints could offer a feasible and anatomically plausible solution for clinical spine mobility assessment.

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak (FR), Bicêtre Hospital (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.