Exercise Preferences, Barriers, Motivators, Facilitators, and Perceived Benefits in Adults With Brain Tumours—A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: Adults with brain tumours face a poor prognosis, and physical and mental impairments reduce quality of life. Exercise can improve outcomes for this population; however, uptake and adherence remain low. Understanding exercise preferences, barriers, motivators, facilitators, and perceived benefits is crucial to optimising engagement. METHODS: A systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, and the Nursing and Allied Health Database (2015-2025) was conducted. Studies were eligible if they included adults (≥ 18 years) with brain tumours and reported original qualitative or quantitative data. Screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, 2018 version) were performed by two authors, with discrepancies resolved by a third. Data were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 163 participants were included, with mean ages of 48-63.5 years and 44.8% males. Most studies included individuals diagnosed with glioblastoma, glioma, or oligodendroglioma. Exercise preferences were reported in 5/7 studies. Participants preferred flexible, individualised exercise programs with varied delivery modes and session durations. Walking was the most commonly preferred activity in 2/7 studies (48%-56% of participants); 1/7 study reported 65% chose multiple activities, including cycling, swimming, and running. Barriers were identified in 5/7 studies, including symptom burden, cognitive impairment, treatment-related side effects, and psychological and external factors. Facilitators and motivators were reported in 3/7 studies and included support from carers and healthcare providers, structural enablers, and intrinsic motivations. Perceived benefits were identified in 5/7 studies, including improved physical function, energy, quality of life, well-being, self-efficacy, and social engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise interventions for adults with brain tumours should be flexible, individualised, and supported by carers and healthcare providers. Moderate aerobic training is preferred, while resistance training remains underexplored. Addressing barriers and providing structured support may enhance uptake and adherence. Further research is needed to establish optimal program characteristics across disease stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71731
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exercise Preferences, Barriers, Motivators, Facilitators, and Perceived Benefits in Adults With Brain Tumours—A Systematic Review

Meg A Doohan, Caroline Robertson, Justin Chapman, Lisa Simmons et al.
Cancer Medicine
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Exercise Preferences, Barriers, Motivators, Facilitators, and Perceived Benefits in Adults With Brain Tumours—A Systematic Review

Meg A Doohan, Caroline Robertson, Justin Chapman, Lisa Simmons, Max Walker, G. K. B. Halkett, David Mizrahi
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adults with brain tumours face a poor prognosis, and physical and mental impairments reduce quality of life. Exercise can improve outcomes for this population; however, uptake and adherence remain low. Understanding exercise preferences, barriers, motivators, facilitators, and perceived benefits is crucial to optimising engagement. METHODS: A systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, and the Nursing and Allied Health Database (2015-2025) was conducted. Studies were eligible if they included adults (≥ 18 years) with brain tumours and reported original qualitative or quantitative data. Screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, 2018 version) were performed by two authors, with discrepancies resolved by a third. Data were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 163 participants were included, with mean ages of 48-63.5 years and 44.8% males. Most studies included individuals diagnosed with glioblastoma, glioma, or oligodendroglioma. Exercise preferences were reported in 5/7 studies. Participants preferred flexible, individualised exercise programs with varied delivery modes and session durations. Walking was the most commonly preferred activity in 2/7 studies (48%-56% of participants); 1/7 study reported 65% chose multiple activities, including cycling, swimming, and running. Barriers were identified in 5/7 studies, including symptom burden, cognitive impairment, treatment-related side effects, and psychological and external factors. Facilitators and motivators were reported in 3/7 studies and included support from carers and healthcare providers, structural enablers, and intrinsic motivations. Perceived benefits were identified in 5/7 studies, including improved physical function, energy, quality of life, well-being, self-efficacy, and social engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise interventions for adults with brain tumours should be flexible, individualised, and supported by carers and healthcare providers. Moderate aerobic training is preferred, while resistance training remains underexplored. Addressing barriers and providing structured support may enhance uptake and adherence. Further research is needed to establish optimal program characteristics across disease stages.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(4)
Griffith University (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU), Curtin University (AU), Metro South Health (AU), Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU), James Cook University (AU), Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Griffith University
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.