Testing the Role of Temporal Attention in Speech: Pretarget Alpha Predicts Memory Encoding Rather Than Effects of Linguistic Focus

= 40; 26 females, 12 males, 2 nonbinary). Using an auditory question-answer paradigm, we tested whether pretarget alpha power tracks the temporal prioritization of focused words in the discourse. We found that pretarget alpha was comparable before focused and defocused words, inconsistent with the view that attention is temporally preallocated to discourse-relevant information. Instead, trial-by-trial fluctuations in pretarget alpha modulated a centroparietal ERP subsequent memory effect for focused words, linking preparatory attention to the depth of processing and memory encoding during comprehension. These findings constrain theories of attention in language, indicating that alpha-band activity primarily indexes an encoding-ready state that predicts subsequent memory rather than focus-driven temporal attentional preallocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2099-25.2026
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the Role of Temporal Attention in Speech: Pretarget Alpha Predicts Memory Encoding Rather Than Effects of Linguistic Focus

Eleonora J. Beier, Assaf Breska, Yulia Oganian, Lee M. Miller et al.
Journal of Neuroscience
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Testing the Role of Temporal Attention in Speech: Pretarget Alpha Predicts Memory Encoding Rather Than Effects of Linguistic Focus

Eleonora J. Beier, Assaf Breska, Yulia Oganian, Lee M. Miller, Tamara Y. Swaab, George R. Mangun
article en

Abstract

= 40; 26 females, 12 males, 2 nonbinary). Using an auditory question-answer paradigm, we tested whether pretarget alpha power tracks the temporal prioritization of focused words in the discourse. We found that pretarget alpha was comparable before focused and defocused words, inconsistent with the view that attention is temporally preallocated to discourse-relevant information. Instead, trial-by-trial fluctuations in pretarget alpha modulated a centroparietal ERP subsequent memory effect for focused words, linking preparatory attention to the depth of processing and memory encoding during comprehension. These findings constrain theories of attention in language, indicating that alpha-band activity primarily indexes an encoding-ready state that predicts subsequent memory rather than focus-driven temporal attentional preallocation.

Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 46(18)
University of California System (US), Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE), Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen (DE), University of Birmingham (GB), University of California, Davis (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, German Academic Exchange Service London
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.