Paclitaxel Coated Balloons for Haemodialysis Vascular Access Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel coated balloons have been used to prevent recurrent stenosis in haemodialysis vascular access. Despite the availability of many randomised controlled trials (RCTs), its effectiveness compared with plain balloon angioplasty remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify RCTs comparing paclitaxel coated balloons with plain balloons for vascular access stenosis. DATA SOURCES: Embase.com and Ovid/Medline. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Embase.com and Ovid/Medline on 02 September 2025 to identify RCTs comparing paclitaxel coated balloons with plain balloons for vascular access stenosis. The primary endpoint was loss of primary patency at 12 months. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) tool and certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE. The summary treatment effect was estimated by meta-analysis using random effects models with an inverse variance approach based on odds ratios. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024502432) and conducted without external funding. RESULTS: 10%). This resulted in a number needed to treat of seven (95% CI 5 - 10) paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasties to prevent one access related re-intervention. Sensitivity analyses found no impact of variations in study design, risk of bias, or the time point of analysis on the treatment effect of paclitaxel coated balloons. In subgroup analyses, the treatment effect was not significantly different for arteriovenous fistulas and grafts, for new and recurrent stenosis, or for paclitaxel coated balloon type. The certainty of evidence was high for loss of primary patency and low for vascular access thrombosis and abandonment. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty for vascular access stenosis reduces the odds of re-intervention at 1 year compared with plain balloon angioplasty. This meta-analysis provides high certainty evidence to support a strong recommendation to use paclitaxel coated balloons when treating vascular access stenosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2026.03.041
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paclitaxel Coated Balloons for Haemodialysis Vascular Access Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

G Allers, Ingeborg van Dusseldorp, N. Karunanithy, G. Mestres et al.
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Paclitaxel Coated Balloons for Haemodialysis Vascular Access Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

G Allers, Ingeborg van Dusseldorp, N. Karunanithy, G. Mestres, Maarten G. Snoeijs, R. Coscas, E. Atkins, U. Hedin, G. Sengolge, F. Gentile, T. Jemcov, N. Sadaghianloo, R. Shahverdyan, J.M. Abadal, P.M. Kitrou, N. Inston, Rutger J.B. Brans
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel coated balloons have been used to prevent recurrent stenosis in haemodialysis vascular access. Despite the availability of many randomised controlled trials (RCTs), its effectiveness compared with plain balloon angioplasty remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify RCTs comparing paclitaxel coated balloons with plain balloons for vascular access stenosis. DATA SOURCES: Embase.com and Ovid/Medline. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Embase.com and Ovid/Medline on 02 September 2025 to identify RCTs comparing paclitaxel coated balloons with plain balloons for vascular access stenosis. The primary endpoint was loss of primary patency at 12 months. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) tool and certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE. The summary treatment effect was estimated by meta-analysis using random effects models with an inverse variance approach based on odds ratios. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024502432) and conducted without external funding. RESULTS: 10%). This resulted in a number needed to treat of seven (95% CI 5 - 10) paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasties to prevent one access related re-intervention. Sensitivity analyses found no impact of variations in study design, risk of bias, or the time point of analysis on the treatment effect of paclitaxel coated balloons. In subgroup analyses, the treatment effect was not significantly different for arteriovenous fistulas and grafts, for new and recurrent stenosis, or for paclitaxel coated balloon type. The certainty of evidence was high for loss of primary patency and low for vascular access thrombosis and abandonment. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty for vascular access stenosis reduces the odds of re-intervention at 1 year compared with plain balloon angioplasty. This meta-analysis provides high certainty evidence to support a strong recommendation to use paclitaxel coated balloons when treating vascular access stenosis.

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Maastricht University (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.