Patient experiences in trials of minimally invasive thoracic surgery: A mixed-methods study

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery, including robotic-assisted and video-assisted approaches, is increasingly used to treat lung cancer. While technical outcomes are well documented, patient experiences within clinical trials remain under-explored. To evaluate patient experiences of clinical trial participation involving advanced surgical modalities for lung cancer. This two-site, mixed-methods study evaluated patient perceptions of participation in the DURATION (ctDNA monitoring) and VGT-309 (fluorescent imaging) trials. Twenty-six participants completed quantitative surveys assessing pre-trial expectations, experiences, and collaboration with research teams. Sixteen participants completed semi-structured interviews, analyzed using thematic analysis. Twenty-six participants completed surveys and sixteen completed interviews. Motivations for enrollment included advancing science (100%), altruism (80.8%), and personal benefit (61.5%). Satisfaction was universally high, with participants reporting positive surgical experiences, supportive staff interactions, and minimal procedural burden. Most participants (88.5%) expressed willingness to participate in future trials, and 96.2% would recommend trial involvement to others. Qualitative analysis identified seven domains characterizing patient experiences throughout the trial process: motivations for enrollment, communication from the trials team, influences on surgical decision-making, surgical expectations, postoperative care, challenges to participation, and overall experience. Challenges such as perioperative anxiety and logistical demands were minor and did not detract from overall satisfaction. Overall, participants described the trial experience as seamless and personally meaningful. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted or video-assisted thoracic surgery within clinical trials report overwhelmingly positive experiences. The integration of patient-centered communication and advanced technology creates a seamless perioperative journey. Clinicians should not hesitate to enroll appropriate patients in trials featuring surgical innovations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03362-0
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient experiences in trials of minimally invasive thoracic surgery: A mixed-methods study

Jennifer Donnelly, G. Wright, A. Brook
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Patient experiences in trials of minimally invasive thoracic surgery: A mixed-methods study

Jennifer Donnelly, G. Wright, A. Brook
article en

Abstract

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery, including robotic-assisted and video-assisted approaches, is increasingly used to treat lung cancer. While technical outcomes are well documented, patient experiences within clinical trials remain under-explored. To evaluate patient experiences of clinical trial participation involving advanced surgical modalities for lung cancer. This two-site, mixed-methods study evaluated patient perceptions of participation in the DURATION (ctDNA monitoring) and VGT-309 (fluorescent imaging) trials. Twenty-six participants completed quantitative surveys assessing pre-trial expectations, experiences, and collaboration with research teams. Sixteen participants completed semi-structured interviews, analyzed using thematic analysis. Twenty-six participants completed surveys and sixteen completed interviews. Motivations for enrollment included advancing science (100%), altruism (80.8%), and personal benefit (61.5%). Satisfaction was universally high, with participants reporting positive surgical experiences, supportive staff interactions, and minimal procedural burden. Most participants (88.5%) expressed willingness to participate in future trials, and 96.2% would recommend trial involvement to others. Qualitative analysis identified seven domains characterizing patient experiences throughout the trial process: motivations for enrollment, communication from the trials team, influences on surgical decision-making, surgical expectations, postoperative care, challenges to participation, and overall experience. Challenges such as perioperative anxiety and logistical demands were minor and did not detract from overall satisfaction. Overall, participants described the trial experience as seamless and personally meaningful. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted or video-assisted thoracic surgery within clinical trials report overwhelmingly positive experiences. The integration of patient-centered communication and advanced technology creates a seamless perioperative journey. Clinicians should not hesitate to enroll appropriate patients in trials featuring surgical innovations.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
Winthrop-University Hospital (US), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.